Comparison of culture and real‐time PCR for detection and quantification of five putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in subgingival plaque samples
- 21 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Vol. 32 (7) , 778-783
Abstract
Objectives: Bacterial cultivation is a well‐established method for analyzing plaque samples. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a novel rapid method for the identification and quantification of periodontopathogenic bacteria that has been recently introduced. In this study, we compared real‐time PCR with conventional anaerobic cultivation.Method: A total of 78 subgingival plaque samples were harvested from pockets 5 mm in 22 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis and immediately transferred into transport medium. Aliquots were evaluated with species‐specific probes by real‐time PCR (meridol® Perio Diagnostics, GABA) and anaerobic bacteria culture on selective media for the detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Tannerella forsythensis. The analysis was performed by two separate, blinded examiners.Results: When real‐time PCR was compared with the culture method (golden standard) for the detection of putative periodontopathogenic bacteria, the sensitivity and specificity for A. actinomycetemcomitans were 67% and 100%, respectively (κ: 0.79); for F. nucleatum 73% and 53%, respectively (κ: 0.21); for P. gingivalis 94% and 84%, respectively (κ: 0.77); for P. intermedia 33% and 94%, respectively (κ: 0.26) and for T. forsythensis 92% and 56%, respectively (κ: 0.51). Spearman's correlation coefficients for the quantitative results of both methods were 0.82 for A. actinomycetemcomitans, 0.33 for F. nucleatum, 0.83 for P. gingivalis, 0.38 for P. intermedia and 0.67 for T. forsythensis.Conclusion: Overall, the agreement between both test methods was excellent for A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis, fair for T. forsythensis and poor for F. nucleatum and P. intermedia. The discrepancies in the results may be explained by the inability of cultivation methods to distinguish between close related taxa, and the problems of keeping periopathogenic bacteria viable, which is required for standard cultivation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative detection of periodontal pathogens using real‐time polymerase chain reaction with TaqMan probesOral Microbiology and Immunology, 2004
- TaqMan real‐time polymerase chain reaction assay for the correlation of Treponema denticola numbers with the severity of periodontal diseaseOral Microbiology and Immunology, 2004
- Detection and Quantification of Oral Treponemes in Subgingival Plaque by Real-Time PCRJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Comparison of microbial cultivation and a commercial PCR based method fordetection of periodontopathogenic species in subgingival plaque samplesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2002
- Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assaysJournal of Molecular Endocrinology, 2000
- Comparison of the microbiota of supra‐ and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitisJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2000
- Periodontal Diseases: Microbial FactorsAnnals of Periodontology, 1996
- The laboratory diagnosis of periodontal infectionsPeriodontology 2000, 1995
- The impact of 16S ribosomal RNA‐based phylogeny on the taxonomy of oral bacteriaPeriodontology 2000, 1994
- The Bacterial Etiology of Destructive Periodontal Disease: Current ConceptsJournal of Periodontology, 1992