Describing a group in positive terms reduces prejudice less effectively than describing it in positive and negative terms
Authors:
- Markus BrauerMBMarkus Brauer
- Abdelatif Er-RafiyAEAbdelatif Er-Rafiy
- Kerry KawakamiKKKerry Kawakami
- Curtis E. PhillsCPCurtis E. Phills
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Vol. 48 (3) , 757-761
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discriminationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011
- L’effet bénéfique de l’augmentation de la variabilité perçue sur la réduction des préjugés et de la discriminationL’Année psychologique, 2010
- Implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and stereotyping: do they assess the same underlying knowledge structure?European Journal of Social Psychology, 2004
- Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-Sided PersuasionJournal of Consumer Research, 1994
- Cognitive models of stereotype changeJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1992
- Prior familiarity, perceived bias, and one-sided versus two-sided communicationsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967