The level of agreement among experts applying best professional judgment to assess the condition of benthic infaunal communities
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Indicators
- Vol. 8 (4) , 389-394
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paradox of estuarine quality: Benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the futureMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2007
- The new European Marine Strategy Directive: Difficulties, opportunities, and challengesMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2006
- The European water framework directive: A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf researchContinental Shelf Research, 2005
- Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological qualityMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2005
- The biotic indices and the Water Framework Directive: the required consensus in the new benthic monitoring toolsMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2004
- The application of a Marine Biotic Index to different impact sources affecting soft-bottom benthic communities along European coastsMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2003
- A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal EnvironmentsMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2000
- Abundance biomass comparison (ABC method): effects of an estuarine gradient, anoxic/hypoxic events and contaminated sedimentsMarine Biology, 1993
- Biological criteria, environmental health and estuarine macrobenthic community structureMarine Pollution Bulletin, 1993
- The value of benthic infauna in marine pollution monitoring studiesMarine Pollution Bulletin, 1987