Effect of Motivational Interviewing on a Weight Loss Program Based on the Protection Motivation Theory
Open Access
- 23 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by DoNotEdit in Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
- Vol. 17 (6) , e23492
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of overweight and obesity is on the increase the world over, which imposes an ever-increasing burden on societies and health care systems. Objectives: This study sought to investigate the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on a weight-loss program based on the protection motivation theory (PMT). Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial study, comprising pretest-posttest with a control group, was conducted on 150 overweight and obese women attending a private nutrition clinic for the first time. Samples were randomly selected using the clinic’s records and then allocated to three groups (50 women in each group) receiving: 1) a standard weight-control program; 2) motivational interviewing; and 3) MI plus intention intervention. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire through in-person interviews and were analyzed using SPSS (version 11) and statistical tests, including the Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way analysis of variance, paired t-test, and linear regression model. Results: In the two intervention groups, the PMT construct scores, namely susceptibility (P = 0.001), severity (P = 0.001), rewards (P =0.004), self-efficacy (P = 0.001), response efficacy (P = 0.001), and costs (P = 0.014), were significantly increased compared to those in the control group. The anthropometric status was statistically significant in the MI group (P = 0.001) and the MI plus intention-intervention group (P = 0.001) at 2 months’ follow-up, while in the control group, weight was meaningfully different after the intervention (P = 0.027). Weight was different between the groups after the intervention, with the Tukey test demonstrating that the differences were statistically significant between the control group and the MI group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that MI, combined with the implementation of intention intervention, increased weight loss and PMT construct scores in our study population. Keywords: Motivational Interviewing; Weight Loss; HumansKeywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding consumer receptivity towards foods and non‐prescription pills containing phytosterols as a means to offset the risk of cardiovascular disease: an application of protection motivation theoryInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 2010
- Diet quality and obesity in women: the Framingham Nutrition StudiesBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2009
- Prevalence of Obesity and Correlations With Lifestyle and Dietary Factors in Chinese MenObesity, 2008
- Stress Management Versus Lifestyle Modification on Systolic Hypertension and Medication Elimination: A Randomized TrialThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2008
- Obesity in women: a life cycle of medical riskInternational Journal of Obesity, 2007
- The Emerging Evidence Base for Motivational Interviewing: A Meta-Analytic and Qualitative InquiryJournal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2004
- The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2003
- Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentionsBritish Journal of Health Psychology, 2002
- A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2001