Isospin asymmetry and type-I superconductivity in neutron star matter
Authors:
- 30 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review C
- Vol. 72 (5) , 055801
Abstract
It has been argued by Buckley et al. [1] that nuclear matter is a type-I rather than a type-II superconductor. The suggested mechanism is a strong interaction between neutron and proton Cooper pairs, which arises from an assumed U(2) symmetry of the effective potential, which is supposed to originate in isospin symmetry of the underlying nuclear interactions. To test this claim, we perform an explicit mean-field calculation of the effective potential of the Cooper pairs in a model with a simple four-point pairing interaction. In the neutron star context, matter is very neutron rich with less than 10% protons, so there is no neutron-proton pairing. We find that under these conditions our model shows no interaction between proton Cooper pairs and neutron Cooper pairs at the mean-field level. We estimate the leading contribution beyond mean field and find that it is small and attractive at weak coupling.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vortices and type-I superconductivity in neutron starsPhysical Review C, 2004
- Neutron Stars as Type-I SuperconductorsPhysical Review Letters, 2004
- Comment on “Constraining Hadronic Superfluidity with Neutron Star Precession”Physical Review Letters, 2004
- Constraining Hadronic Superfluidity with Neutron Star PrecessionPhysical Review Letters, 2003
- Pairing in nuclear systems: from neutron stars to finite nucleiReviews of Modern Physics, 2003
- Self-energy effects on isospin singlet pairing in nuclear matterPhysical Review C, 2002
- Transition from BCS pairing to Bose-Einstein condensation in low-density asymmetric nuclear matterPhysical Review C, 2001
- Thermodynamics of aCondensate in Asymmetric Nuclear MatterPhysical Review Letters, 2000
- The Physics of Quantum Fields2000
- Introduction to SuperconductivityPhysics Today, 1996