Poor Survival for Infants WithMYCN-Amplified Metastatic Neuroblastoma Despite Intensified Treatment: The International Society of Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma Experience
Authors:
- Adela CaneteACAdela Canete
- Mary GerrardMGMary Gerrard
- Hervé RubieHRHervé Rubie
- Victoria CastelVCVictoria Castel
- Andrea Di CataldoACAndrea Di Cataldo
- Caroline MunzerCMCaroline Munzer
- Ruth LadensteinRLRuth Ladenstein
- Bénédicte BrichardBBBénédicte Brichard
- José D. BermúdezJBJosé D. Bermúdez
- Jerôme CouturierJCJerôme Couturier
- Bruno de BernardiBBBruno de Bernardi
- Andrew J. PearsonAPAndrew J. Pearson
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (7) , 1014-1019
Abstract
Purpose: To report the results of a prospective, nonrandomized European study on infants with neuroblastoma and MYCN gene amplification.Patients and Methods: Infants with neuroblastoma (stage 2, 3, 4, and 4s) and MYCN gene amplification who were diagnosed between 1999 and 2004 were eligible for enrollment onto the study. After diagnosis, staging, and mandatory biologic studies, induction chemotherapy (IC) with conventional drugs was administered, followed by delayed surgery, megatherapy (busulfan-melphalan as a conditioning regimen), and local radiotherapy.Results: Of the 46 infants enrolled onto the study, 35 infants were eligible; of these 35 infants, 97% had metastatic spread (24 infants had stage 4, and 10 infants had stage 4s). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 30% (SE, 0.08), with median survival time of 12 months, and 23 deaths due to disease. Two-year, event-free survival (EFS) was 29% (SE, 0.07). The treatment was well tolerated with no deaths as a result of toxicity or severe toxicity. Despite protocol adherence, 30% of the patients who were assessable for response to IC experienced disease progression or did not respond. Stage and high lactate dehydrogenase reached significance in the univariate analysis (P = .028 and .039, respectively for OS; and P = .05 and .031 respectively, for EFS). Ten of 16 patients who received megatherapy are still alive.Conclusion: Although treatment was well tolerated, survival was poor and our IC failed to achieve a satisfactory response in 30% of our patients. New therapeutic approaches and more intense world-wide collaboration are needed to achieve a cure in this population.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Value of International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification in Localized Resectable Peripheral Neuroblastic Tumors: A Histopathologic Study of Localized Neuroblastoma European Study Group 94.01 Trial and ProtocolJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Surgical Risk Factors in Primary Surgery for Localized Neuroblastoma: The LNESG1 Study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Survival Analysis Using S2003
- Quality Assessment of Genetic Markers Used for Therapy StratificationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigmaNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Adverse outcome of infants with metastatic neuroblastoma, MYCN amplification and/or bone lesions: results of the French Society of Pediatric OncologyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Intensive Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation, and 13-cis-Retinoic AcidNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958