Safety and clinical efficacy of the double switch from originator infliximab to biosimilars CT‐P13 and SB2 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (SCESICS): A multicenter cohort study
Authors:
Open Access
- 15 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Science
- Vol. 15 (1) , 172-181
Abstract
Data regarding double switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to IFX biosimilars in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from originator IFX to CT‐P13 and subsequently to SB2 (double switch) in patients with IBD. Patients undergoing IFX‐double switch in eight Centers in Lombardy (Italy) from November 2018 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The IFX discontinuation rate, incidence and type of adverse events (AEs), and clinical remission rate were recorded. A comparison with a control group of patients with IBD single‐switched from originator IFX to CT‐P13 was performed, before and after an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)‐based propensity score analysis. Fifty‐two double‐switched patients with IBD were enrolled. The 24‐ and 52‐week proportions of patients continuing on IFX therapy following the second switch (CTP13 → SB2) were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 94%–100%) and 90% (95% CI 81%–99%), respectively. Four patients experienced a total of five AEs, all graded 1–3 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). No infusion reactions were observed. The 24‐week and follow‐up end clinical remission rates following the second switch were 94% and 88%, respectively. No differences were observed in the safety and efficacy outcomes by comparing the double‐switch group with a single‐switch group of 66 patients with IBD; all these results were confirmed by IPTW‐adjusted analysis. The study suggests both the safety and efficacy of the double switch from originator IFX to CT‐P13 and SB2 in patients with IBD is maintained. This strategy may be associated with potential cost implications.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing SB2, an infliximab biosimilar, to the infliximab reference product Remicade in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapyAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2017
- Efficacy and Safety of the Biosimilar Infliximab CT-P13 Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Prospective, Multicentre, Nationwide CohortJournal of Crohn's and Colitis, 2015
- A Randomized, Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing SB2 and Infliximab Reference Product (Remicade®) in Healthy SubjectsBioDrugs, 2015
- Systematic review: predicting and optimising response to anti‐TNF therapy in Crohn's disease – algorithm for practical managementAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2015
- Use of biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: Statements of the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseDigestive and Liver Disease, 2014
- The use of biosimilars in immune-mediated disease: A joint Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR), Italian Society of Dermatology (SIDeMaST), and Italian Group of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) position paperAutoimmunity Reviews, 2014
- Joint position statement by "Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva" (Spanish Society of Gastroenterology) and "Sociedad Española de Farmacología" (Spanish Society of Pharmacology) on biosimilar therapy for inflammatory bowel diseaseRevista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2013
- Review article: loss of response to anti-TNF treatments in Crohn’s diseaseAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2011
- Infliximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative ColitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A SIMPLE INDEX OF CROHN'S-DISEASE ACTIVITYThe Lancet, 1980