Substantive Action and Communication in Corporate Philanthropy: Implications of Hypocrisy and Stakeholder Type
Open Access
- 29 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration
- Vol. 42 (4) , 545-556
Abstract
This study investigates the differential effects of corporate philanthropy (CP) on internal and external stakeholders. Specifically, it examines how substantive CP actions (hereafter CP), communication about CP (hereafter CP communication) and hypocritical CP (the gap between communication and action) influence corporate reputation and employee job satisfaction, and how these effects are moderated by the firm's primary customer type (B2B vs. B2C) for both outcomes. This study collects and analyses data on Korean companies. Specifically, the corporate reputation scores from Korea's Most Admirable Company survey and the job satisfaction scores from Job Planet for listed companies in Korea are used for empirical analysis. Finally, 615 company‐years are analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Multigroup analysis was employed to compare B2B and B2C companies. The research indicates that both CP and CP communication positively influence corporate reputation and employee job satisfaction. However, hypocritical CP negatively affects only employee job satisfaction, highlighting the differential impact of CP dimensions on different stakeholder groups. Furthermore, the negative impact of hypocritical CP on job satisfaction was found to be significantly stronger for B2C companies compared to B2B companies. No significant difference was found for the impact of hypocritical CP on corporate reputation between B2B and B2C firms. Grounded in stakeholder theory, this study advances our understanding of hypocritical CP by demonstrating its nuanced effects on different stakeholder types and across different business contexts (B2B vs. B2C). This research provides valuable insights for companies seeking to optimize their CP strategies for improved stakeholder engagement and corporate outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibilityCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2023
- Configurational paths of employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice perspectiveCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020
- Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibilityStrategic Management Journal, 2015
- Walk the Talk? How Symbolic and Substantive CSR Actions Affect Firm Performance Depending on Stakeholder ProximityCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2015
- Self‐Governance for Sustainable Global Supply Chains: Can it Deliver the Impacts Needed?Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013
- The Role of the News Media in Influencing Corporate Environmental Sustainable Development: An Alternative Methodology to Assess Stakeholder EngagementCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2012
- Corporate Social Responsibility in the Chinese Forest Industry: Understanding Multiple Stakeholder PerceptionsCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2011
- CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practicesCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2011
- Corporate social reporting for different audiences: the case of multinational corporations in SpainCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009
- Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performanceStrategic Management Journal, 2002