Shape derivatives in bi-material level-set optimization with a precise interface: a comparative study
Preprint
Abstract
In this study, we investigate and compare formulations for computing shape derivatives in bi-material level-set optimization with precise modeling of the interface. The level-set function is parameterized using B-splines, whose coordinates serve as design variables. A precise mechanical model is obtained every design cycle, replicating the exact geometry of the bi-material design, using untrimming techniques and IGA on unstructured meshes. Design sensitivities are formulated by either a "discretize-then-differentiate" or a "differentiate-then-discretize" approach. A detailed comparative study shows the limitations of the latter in terms of accuracy, specifically when stresses near the material interface dominate the stress field. The precise representation of the interface facilitates an accurate evaluation of interfacial stresses, and the consistent discretized sensitivities enable to minimize them directly -- highlighting the main advantage of our framework. Furthermore, reducing the discretized approach by considering only interface control points and a selective set of adjacent control points provides an ideal trade-off between accuracy and numerical efficiency. This lays the foundations for multi-material shape and topology optimization procedures, considering accurate responses on the interface.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficient stress‐constrained topology optimization using inexact design sensitivitiesInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2021
- Shape optimization of microstructural designs subject to local stress constraints within an XFEM-level set frameworkStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016
- Topology optimization using an explicit interface representationStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013
- A mesh evolution algorithm based on the level set method for geometry and topology optimizationStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013
- Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a reviewStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013
- A mixed FEM approach to stress‐constrained topology optimizationInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007
- Stress concentration minimization of 2D filets using X-FEM and level set descriptionStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007
- Level Set Methods: An Overview and Some Recent ResultsJournal of Computational Physics, 2001
- Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structuresStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1994
- The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimizationInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987