Bias in cohort studies
Authors:
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by IMR Press in Hospital Medicine
- Vol. 61 (2) , 133-135
Abstract
Cohort studies allow an exploration of patient change over time. They can provide information on the incidence of disease, prognosis (including patient satisfaction) and likely health-care resource use. Nonetheless, bias can be present in cohort studies in the way patients are selected and followed-up, the way measures are taken, or the way data are analysed. This short paper explores ways in which such flaws can be uncovered in published studies, so that their findings can be interpreted appropriately.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in surveysHospital Medicine, 1999
- Bias in treatment trialsHospital Medicine, 1999
- Confounded by confounding: separating association from causationHospital Medicine, 1999
- EditorialPain, 1998
- Evidence-based medicineSeminars in Perinatology, 1997
- Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careBMJ, 1996
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1994
- Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ, 1986
- THE EFFECTS OF MATERNALLY ADMINISTERED PETHIDINE OR EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE ON THE FETUS AND NEWBORNBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1979
- Bias in analytic researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979