The Potential of Diverse Youth as Stakeholders in Identifying and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias for a Future of Fairer AI
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 September 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Vol. 7 (CSCW2) , 1-27
Abstract
Youth regularly use technology driven by artificial intelligence (AI). However, it is increasingly well-known that AI can cause harm on small and large scales, especially for those underrepresented in tech fields. Recently, users have played active roles in surfacing and mitigating harm from algorithmic bias. Despite being frequent users of AI, youth have been under-explored as potential contributors and stakeholders to the future of AI. We consider three notions that may be at the root of youth facing barriers to playing an active role in responsible AI, which are youth (1) cannot understand the technical aspects of AI, (2) cannot understand the ethical issues around AI, and (3) need protection from serious topics related to bias and injustice. In this study, we worked with youth (N = 30) in first through twelfth grade and parents (N = 6) to explore how youth can be part of identifying algorithmic bias and designing future systems to address problematic technology behavior. We found that youth are capable of identifying and articulating algorithmic bias, often in great detail. Participants suggested different ways users could give feedback for AI that reflects their values of diversity and inclusion. Youth who may have less experience with computing or exposure to societal structures can be supported by peers or adults with more of this knowledge, leading to critical conversations about fairer AI. This work illustrates youths' insights, suggesting that they should be integrated in building a future of responsible AI.Keywords
Funding Information
- NSF (1811086)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Care Partnerships2016
- Out of Time, Out of Place2016
- Children's developing understanding of legitimate reasons for allocating resources unequallyCognitive Development, 2016
- "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]"2015
- Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations2015
- Boys and girls taking risks online: A gendered perspective on social context and adolescents’ risky online behaviorNew Media & Society, 2014
- Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishnessProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014
- Confusing Claims for Data: A Critique of Common Practices for Presenting Qualitative Research on LearningJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2013
- The ethics of paying for children's participation in researchThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2002
- Gauging Children’s Understanding of Artificially Intelligent Objects: A Presentation of “Counterfactuals”International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1998