Physiology dictated treatment after severe trauma: timing is everything
Open Access
- 26 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
- Vol. 48 (5) , 3969-3979
Abstract
Introduction: Damage control strategies in resuscitation and (fracture) surgery have become standard of care in the treatment of severely injured patients. It is suggested that damage control improves survival and decreases the incidence of organ failure. However, these strategies can possibly increase the risk of complications such as infections. Indication for damage control procedures is guided by physiological parameters, type of injury, and the surgeon’s experience. We analyzed outcomes of severely injured patients who underwent emergency surgery. Methods: Severely injured patients, admitted to a level-1 trauma center ICU from 2016 to 2020 who were in need of ventilator support and required immediate surgical intervention ( ≤24 h) were included. Demographics, treatment, and outcome parameters were analyzed. Results: Hundred ninety-five patients were identified with a median ISS of 33 (IQR 25–38). Ninety-seven patients underwent immediate definitive surgery (ETC group), while 98 patients were first treated according to damage control principles with abbreviated surgery (DCS group). Although ISS was similar in both groups, DCS patients were younger, suffered from more severe truncal injuries, were more frequently in shock with more severe acidosis and coagulopathy, and received more blood products. ETC patients with traumatic brain injury needed more often a craniotomy. Seventy-four percent of DCS patients received definitive surgery in the second surgical procedure. There was no difference in mortality, nor any other outcome including organ failure and infections. Conclusions: When in severely injured patients treatment is dictated by physiology into either early definitive surgery or damage control with multiple shorter procedures stretched over several days combined with aggressive resuscitation with blood products, outcome is comparable in terms of complications.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Timing of Orthopaedic Surgery in Multiple Trauma PatientsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2013
- Changes in the epidemiology and prediction of multiple-organ failure after injuryJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2013
- Impact of Closure at the First Take Back: Complication Burden and Potential Overutilization of Damage Control LaparotomyJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2011
- Damage Control Resuscitation Is Associated With a Reduction in Resuscitation Volumes and Improvement in Survival in 390 Damage Control Laparotomy PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 2011
- Damage Control Resuscitation in Combination With Damage Control Laparotomy: A Survival AdvantageJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2010
- Damage Control Laparotomy: A Vital Tool Once OverusedJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2010
- The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Early Predictors of Postinjury Multiple Organ FailureArchives of Surgery, 1994
- ‘DAMAGE CONTROL'1993
- Management of the Major Coagulopathy with Onset during LaparotomyAnnals of Surgery, 1983