Effects of Pharmacologically Targeting Neuroimmune Pathways on Alcohol Drinking in Mice Selectively Bred to Drink to Intoxication
- 13 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
- Vol. 44 (2) , 553-566
Abstract
Background: Rodent models of high alcohol drinking offer opportunities to better understand factors for alcohol use disorders (AUD) and test potential treatments. Selective breeding was carried out to create 2 unique High Drinking in the Dark (HDID‐1, HDID‐2) mouse lines that represent models of genetic risk for binge‐like drinking. A number of studies have indicated that neuroimmune genes are important for regulation of alcohol drinking. We tested whether compounds shown to reduce drinking in other models also reduce alcohol intake in these unique genetic lines.Methods: We report tests of gabapentin, tesaglitazar, fenofibrate, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), ibrutinib, and rolipram. Although these compounds have different mechanisms of action, they have all been shown to reduce inflammatory responses. We evaluated effects of these compounds on alcohol intake. In order to facilitate comparison with previously published findings for some compounds, we employed similar schedules that were previously used for that compound.Results: Gabapentin increased ethanol (EtOH) binge‐like alcohol drinking in female HDID‐1 and HS/NPT mice. Tesaglitazar and fenofibrate did not alter 2‐bottle choice (2BC) drinking in male HDID‐1 or HS/NPT mice. However, tesaglitazar had no effect on DID EtOH intake but reduced blood alcohol levels (BAL), and fenofibrate increased DID intake with no effects on BAL. CAPE had no effect on EtOH intake. Ibrutinib reduced intake in female HDID‐1 in initial testing, but did not reduce intake in a second week of testing. Rolipram reduced DID intake and BALs in male and female HDID‐1, HDID‐2, and HS/NPT mice.Conclusions: A number of compounds shown to reduce EtOH drinking in other models, and genotypes are not effective in HDID mice or their genetically heterogeneous founders, HS/NPT. The most promising compound was the PDE4 inhibitor, rolipram. These results highlight the importance of assessing generalizability when rigorously testing compounds for therapeutic development.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA013519, AA013520, AA10760, R24 AA020245)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (BX000313, CDA2 BX002488)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethanol Sensitivity in High Drinking in the Dark Selectively Bred MiceAlcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research, 2012
- Alcohol preference drinking in a mouse line selectively bred for high drinking in the darkAlcohol, 2011
- Limited access ethanol drinking in the dark in adolescent and adult micePharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2011
- Fenofibrate Reduces Systemic Inflammation Markers Independent of Its Effects on Lipid and Glucose Metabolism in Patients with the Metabolic SyndromeThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2010
- A Line of Mice Selected for High Blood Ethanol Concentrations Shows Drinking in the Dark to IntoxicationBiological Psychiatry, 2009
- Voluntary ethanol consumption in 22 inbred mouse strainsAlcohol, 2008
- Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decadesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J micePhysiology & Behavior, 2005
- Emerging roles of PPARS in inflammation and immunityNature Reviews Immunology, 2002
- The Antidepressant and Antiinflammatory Effects of Rolipram in the Central Nervous SystemCNS Drug Reviews, 2001