Basel III: Long‐term Impact on Economic Performance and Fluctuations
Authors:
- 24 April 2014
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Manchester School
- Vol. 83 (2) , 217-251
Abstract
Using a wide range of macroeconomic and econometric models we assess the long‐term economic impact of the Basel III reform. Our main results are the following. (1) The economic costs of the new regulatory standards for bank capital and liquidity are considerably below existing estimates of the benefits that the reform should have by reducing the probability of banking crises (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010) ‘An Assessment of the Long‐term Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements’, Basel). (2) The reform dampens output volatility modestly, although there is some heterogeneity across models. (3) The adoption of countercyclical capital buffers can substantially amplify the dampening effect on output volatility.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monetary and Macroprudential PoliciesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2011
- Pro-Cyclicality of Capital Regulation: Is it a Problem? How to Fix it?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- THE CYCLICALITY OF PRICE-COST MARGINS IN BANKING: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ITS DETERMINANTSEconomic Inquiry, 2010
- Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Exploring OptionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Financial Shocks and Optimal PolicySSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- On dividend restrictions and the collapse of the interbank marketAnnals of Finance, 2010
- Mapping Capital and Liquidity Requirements to Bank Lending SpreadsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Bank Capital Ratios Across Countries: Why Do They Vary?Journal of Financial Services Research, 2008
- Basel II: The Route Ahead or Cul‐de‐Sac?Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2006
- Corporate Finance and the Monetary Transmission MechanismThe Review of Financial Studies, 2006