Intersectoral Collaboration and Complex Health Emergencies: Insights From a Comparative Analysis of Public Space Regulation During COVID-19 in Four Canadian Provinces
Open Access
- 7 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Maad Rayan Publishing Company in International Journal of Health Policy and Management
- Vol. 15, e4922
Abstract
Background: This paper contrasts and examines the perceptions of policy communities on the dynamics and factors shaping intersectoral collaboration in governance of health emergencies, drawing on the example of public space regulation during COVID-19 in four Canadian provinces, with the goal of exploring variation and perceived quality of policy responses. Methods: We compared public space regulation in four Canadian provinces—British Columbia (BC), Nova Scotia (NS), Ontario (ON) and Québec (QC)—during COVID-19 from 2020 to 2022. The study was designed as a comparative, qualitative, and explanatory case study, utilizing in-depth interviews and documents. We conducted 103 interviews with a diverse range of stakeholders, including senior government and non-government leaders, reviewed selected policy documents, and media reports. We utilized multisite qualitative analysis to analyze our data and develop within- and cross-case themes. Results: Respondents reported vastly different provincial approaches to intersectoral collaboration within government and with non-governmental stakeholders in the management of public spaces, ranging from higher (BC, NS) to lower (ON, QC) levels of collaboration in governance, as reflected in the access of government and non-government stakeholders to key decision-makers and decision-making forums and processes, the transparency of those processes, and responsiveness to their input. Institutional frameworks, political factors and organizational culture and capacity were the major distinguishing factors between these provincial approaches to collaboration. Disparities in access to decision-makers were reported, with business interests and certain civil society organizations experiencing easier access compared to other public interest groups. Conclusion: Public health challenges are increasingly complex and intersectoral. Research on intersectoral collaboration must examine collaboration dynamics within and outside government holistically, rather than exploring these dynamics in siloes. Stakeholder engagement which combines institutional structures and inclusive stakeholder engagement within and outside government is crucial to managing complex policy processes during crisis and beyond.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vision, relationships, patience … and power: A qualitative analysis of how policy agents scale up cross-sectoral policy for nutritionSocial Science & Medicine, 2025
- Testing “the science”: A comparative analysis of COVID-19 testing policy across four Canadian provincesSocial Science & Medicine, 2025
- Trajectories and patterns of US counties’ policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: A sequence analysis approachSSM - Population Health, 2024
- Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US AdultsJAMA Network Open, 2024
- The Unequal Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Political Interest RepresentationPolitical Behavior, 2022
- Tensions and opportunities in the roles of senior public health officials in Canada: A qualitative studyHealth Policy, 2022
- Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and LegitimacyPublic Organization Review, 2021
- COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectivesPolicy Sciences, 2020
- A review of health governance: Definitions, dimensions and tools to governHealth Policy, 2014
- Sample size in qualitative researchResearch in Nursing & Health, 1995