Reproductive Coercion and Associated Health Consequences: A Scoping Review
Open Access
- 28 November 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
- Vol. 27 (5) , 2511-2522
Abstract
Reproductive coercion (RC) broadly encompasses behaviors that interfere with a person’s reproductive choices, including control over contraception, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes, and can pose considerable health risks. However, its full impact on health remains insufficiently understood. This scoping review systematically examined empirical literature on the health consequences of RC published between 2010 and 2024. Following JBI methodology and Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we searched five databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus) for peer-reviewed studies reporting on RC and associated health outcomes. Sixty-two studies across 18 countries met inclusion criteria, the majority from high-income settings, revealing adverse effects on reproductive, sexual, and mental health. Most studies focused on pregnancy coercion and contraceptive sabotage perpetrated by male partners. RC was consistently associated with adverse mental health outcomes, including post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. Studies associated RC with an increased risk of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Contraceptive use patterns varied: some studies reported reduced uptake among those experiencing RC, while others described increased use of covert long-acting methods and emergency contraception as protective strategies. Few studies examined physical health outcomes or healthcare utilization following RC. Evidence gaps remain regarding the health consequences of other RC behaviors, including coerced continuation or termination of pregnancy and forced contraception, as well as from low- and middle-income contexts. Clarifying the health consequences linked to current or past experiences of different RC behaviors may support healthcare providers in recognizing and responding to RC, to promote reproductive autonomy and improve health outcomes for RC victim-survivors.Keywords
Funding Information
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examining Associations Between Multiple Types of IPV and Adverse Mental Health Among IPV SurvivorsJournal of Family Violence, 2022
- Correlates and contributors of reproductive coercion across the socioecological framework among intimate partner violence survivors in Nairobi, KenyaJournal of Family Violence, 2022
- The role of reproductive coercion in women’s risk for HIV: A case‐control study of outpatients in Gauteng, South AfricaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2020
- Reproductive coercion sometimes works: evaluating whether young African-American women who experience reproductive coercion or birth control sabotage are more likely to become pregnantHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2020
- Coercive Control During Pregnancy, Birthing and Postpartum: Women’s Experiences and Perspectives on Health Practitioners’ ResponsesJournal of Family Violence, 2020
- Stability of Retrospective Pregnancy Intention Reporting Among Women with Unwanted Pregnancies in the United StatesMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2019
- Intimate Partner Violence and PrEP Acceptability Among Low-Income, Young Black Women: Exploring the Mediating Role of Reproductive CoercionAIDS and Behavior, 2017
- Women’s Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an AbortionJAMA Psychiatry, 2017
- A Systematic Review of Reproductive Coercion in International SettingsWorld Medical & Health Policy, 2016
- Use of Reproductive and Sexual Health Services Among Female Family Planning Clinic Clients Exposed to Partner Violence and Reproductive CoercionMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2014