Consensus on patient cases for hospitalised children with a high paediatric track and trigger tool score that raises no mounting concern: a Delphi process study
Open Access
- 8 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Paediatrics Open
- Vol. 6 (1) , e001564
Abstract
Background Paediatric track and trigger tools (PTTTs) based on vital parameters have been implemented in hospitals worldwide to help healthcare professionals identify signs of critical illness and incipient deterioration in hospitalised children. It has been documented that nurses do not use PTTT as intended, but deviate from PTTT protocols because, in some situations, PTTT observations make little sense to them. The present study aimed to reach consensus on whether automatically generated PTTT scores that are higher than deemed reasonable by healthcare professionals according to their professional experience and clinical expertise may be downgraded. Methods A two-round modified Delphi technique was used to explore consensus on 14 patient cases for hospitalised children with a high PTTT score that did not raise concerns by systematically collating questionnaire responses. Participants rated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale. IQR and median were calculated for each case. Findings A total of 221 participants completed round 1 and 101 participants completed round 2. Across the two rounds, majority of the participants were from paediatric departments, nurses and women. In round 1, consensus on inclusion was reached on 2 of the 14 cases. In round 2, consensus was reached on one additional patient case. Three of the 11 non-consensus cases remaining after rounds 1 and 2 were included by the research group based on predefined criteria. Conclusion In conclusion, a consensus opinion was achieved on six patient cases where the child had a high PTTT score but where the healthcare professionals were not as concerned as indicated by the PTTT score.Keywords
Funding Information
- Lundbeck Foundation
- The research programme “The Acute Patient”
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF180C0052020)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the Children's Hospital Early Warning System for Critical Deterioration RecognitionJournal of Pediatric Nursing, 2017
- Systematic review of paediatric track and trigger systems for hospitalised childrenResuscitation, 2016
- Nurses’ ‘worry’ as predictor of deteriorating surgical ward patients: A prospective cohort study of the Dutch-Early-Nurse-Worry-Indicator-ScoreInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2016
- Nurses’ worry or concern and early recognition of deteriorating patients on general wards in acute care hospitals: a systematic reviewCritical Care, 2015
- How should medication errors be defined? Development and test of a definitionScandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2012
- Nurses’ role in detecting deterioration in ward patients: systematic literature reviewJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2009
- The deterioration of children in ward areas in a specialist children’s hospitalNursing in Critical Care, 2007
- The Delphi technique: myths and realitiesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2003
- What is a prescribing error?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2000
- Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services researchBMJ, 1995