Communicative Capacity
- 7 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Review of Public Administration
- Vol. 44 (6) , 656-674
Abstract
Questions have arisen about the added value of public encounters for participatory democracy: Do problems with living up to its promises occur because of or despite public professionals and citizens coming together? This article presents the findings of a study that examined their public encounters, or communicative “in-between,” in participatory projects in three European cities. A narrative analysis revealed how the communicative capacity of public professionals and citizens is imperative and yet largely overlooked, that is, their ability to recognize and break through dominant communicative patterns by constantly adapting the nature, tone, and conditions of conversations to the situation at hand. Less time, energy, and resources will be lost if they pay more attention to how they communicate (process) rather than what they talk about (substance). As this proves to be inherently difficult in everyday practice, researchers could play an important role in cultivating communicative capacity.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symposium IntroductionAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 2012
- The Ontology of Process Philosophy in Follett's Administrative TheoryAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 2011
- Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy makingPolicy & Politics, 2011
- The Third Generation of Deliberative DemocracyPolitical Studies Review, 2010
- Dilemmas of Community PlanningPublic Policy and Administration, 2008
- Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political ScienceAnnual Review of Political Science, 2008
- Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative PracticalityPublic Administration Review, 2007
- Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the NetherlandsJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005
- Looking Back to Look ForwardUrban Affairs Review, 2005
- Stories Managers Tell: Why They Are as Valid as SciencePublic Administration Review, 1991