Functional response of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of prey and predator stages
- 10 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Insect Science
- Vol. 18 (2) , 217-224
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feeding activity and life history characteristics of the generalist predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at different prey densitiesJournal of Pest Science, 2004
- Macrolophus caliginosus: Functional response to whiteflies and preference and switching capacity between whiteflies and spider mitesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001
- Effect of Host Plant on the Functional Response of the Predator Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae)Biological Control, 2000
- A survey of insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in the Indian subcontinentBulletin of Entomological Research, 1996
- Overview of Insecticide Resistance1990
- Experimental studies on acarine predator–prey interactions: effects of predator age and feeding history on prey consumption and the functional response (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1981
- Predator‐prey responses in an acarine systemPopulation Ecology, 1980
- Sigmoid Functional Responses by Invertebrate Predators and ParasitoidsJournal of Animal Ecology, 1977
- The Functional Response of Predators to Prey Density and its Role in Mimicry and Population RegulationMemoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 1965
- Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and ParasitismThe Canadian Entomologist, 1959