Improving negative liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry lipidomic analysis of human plasma using acetic acid as a mobile‐phase additive
- 3 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Vol. 32 (3) , 201-211
Abstract
Rationale: Mobile‐phase additives in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) are used to improve peak shape, analyte ionization efficiency and method coverage. Both basic and acidic mobile phases have been used successfully for negative electrospray ionization (ESI), but very few systematic investigations exist to date to justify the choice of mobile phase. Acetic acid was previously shown to improve ionization in untargeted metabolomics of urine, but has not been investigated in lipidomics. The goal of this study was to systematically compare the performance of acetic acid to that of other commonly employed additives in negative LC/ESI‐MS lipidomics. Methods: The performance of acetic acid was compared to that of commonly used mobile‐phase additives in lipidomics, namely ammonium acetate, ammonium acetate with acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide, using lipid standard solutions containing representatives of major mammalian lipid subclasses and isopropanol‐precipitated human plasma. This design allowed comparison of the influence of additive and additive concentration on lipid signal intensity, lipid peak shape and lipid coverage in both simple and complex biological matrices using both Orbitrap and quadrupole time‐of‐flight MS platforms with different ESI source designs. Results: Ammonium hydroxide caused 2‐ to 1000‐fold signal suppression of all lipid classes in comparison to acetic acid. In comparison to ammonium acetate, acetic acid increased lipid signal intensity from 2‐ to 19‐fold for 11 lipid subclasses, and decreased ionization efficiency only for ceramide and phosphatidylcholine lipid classes which can be effectively ionized in positive ESI mode. The improved ionization efficiency using acetic acid also increased lipid coverage by 21–50% versus ammonium acetate additive. Conclusions: Acetic acid at a concentration of 0.02% (v/v) is the suggested choice as a mobile‐phase additive for lipidomics and targeted lipid profiling with negative LC/ESI‐MS based on signal enhancement and improved lipid coverage compared to ammonium acetate, ammonium acetate with acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide mobile phases.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ontario Brain Institute
- Fondation Brain Canada
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of ammonium on liquid- and gas-phase protonation and deprotonation in electrospray ionization mass spectrometryThe Analyst, 2012
- Effect of ionization modifiers on the simultaneous analysis of all classes of phospholipids by nanoflow liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in negative ion modeJournal of Chromatography A, 2012
- Reversed phase LC/MS/MS method for targeted quantification of glycerophospholipid molecular species in plasmaJournal of Chromatography B, 2011
- Expanding Coverage of the Metabolome for Global Metabolite ProfilingAnalytical Chemistry, 2011
- Lipidomics reveals a remarkable diversity of lipids in human plasmaJournal of Lipid Research, 2010
- Lipidomics: An analysis of cellular lipids by ESI-MSMethods, 2006
- Favorable Effects of Weak Acids on Negative-Ion Electrospray Ionization Mass SpectrometryAnalytical Chemistry, 2004
- A study of ion suppression effects in electrospray ionization from mobile phase additives and solid‐phase extractsRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2003
- Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentalsMass Spectrometry Reviews, 2001
- Do the Electrospray Mass Spectra Reflect the Ion Concentrations in Sample Solution?Journal of the Mass Spectrometry Society of Japan, 1995