Elections have (health) consequences: Depression, anxiety, and the 2020 presidential election
- 13 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Economics & Human Biology
- Vol. 47, 101191
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship of Level of Positive Mental Health With Current Mental Disorders in Predicting Suicidal Behavior and Academic Impairment in College StudentsJournal of American College Health, 2012
- Physiological stress responses to the 2008 U.S. presidential election: The role of policy preferences and social dominance orientationGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2011
- When endocrinology and democracy collide: Emotions, cortisol and voting at national electionsEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2011
- Stressful politics: Voters’ cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential electionPsychoneuroendocrinology, 2010
- The testosterone–cortisol ratio: A hormonal marker for proneness to social aggressionInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2009
- The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general populationJournal of Affective Disorders, 2009
- Seasonality is associated with anxiety and depression: The Hordaland health studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2008
- Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research.Psychological Bulletin, 2004
- “Love thy neighbour”—it's good for your health: a study of racial homogeneity, mortality and social cohesion in the United StatesSocial Science & Medicine, 2003
- Anticipatory anxiety and risk perceptionCognitive Therapy and Research, 1987