Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided In-bore Prostate Biopsy versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy Naïve Men with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen
Authors:
- 1 November 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 192 (5) , 1374-1379
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is increasingly performed to diagnose prostate cancer. However, there is a lack of well controlled, prospective trials to support this treatment method. We prospectively compared magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen. We performed a prospective study in 132 biopsy naïve men with increased prostate specific antigen (greater than 4 ng/ml). After 3 Tesla functional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging patients were referred for magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsy of prostate lesions (maximum 3) followed by standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy (12 cores). We analyzed the detection rates of prostate cancer and significant prostate cancer (greater than 5 mm total cancer length or any Gleason pattern greater than 3). A total of 128 patients with a mean ± SD age of 66.1 ± 8.1 years met all study requirements. Median prostate specific antigen was 6.7 ng/ml (IQR 5.1-9.0). Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsies provided the same 53.1% detection rate, including 79.4% and 85.3%, respectively, for significant prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies missed 7.8% and 9.4% of clinically significant prostate cancers, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging biopsy required significantly fewer cores and revealed a higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core (each p <0.01). Combining the 2 methods provided a 60.9% detection rate with an 82.1% rate for significant prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore and systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies achieved equally high detection rates in biopsy naïve patients with increased prostate specific antigen. Magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore biopsies required significantly fewer cores and revealed a significantly higher percent of cancer involvement per biopsy core.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2014
- Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Suspicion Levels for Detecting Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2013
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound–Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound BiopsyEuropean Urology, 2013
- Role of magnetic resonance imaging in defining a biopsy strategy for detection of prostate cancerInternational Journal of Urology, 2013
- MRI-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical ResultsCurrent Urology Reports, 2013
- International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality RatesEuropean Urology, 2012
- Prospective Evaluation of 3-T MRI Performed Before Initial Transrectal Ultrasound–Guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients With High Prostate-Specific Antigen and No Previous BiopsyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2011
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screeningBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practiceMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2008