When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:

• Mendelian randomisation: a new spin or real progress?
  The Lancet, 2003
• ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?*
  International Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
• Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering
  The Lancet, 2002
• Causation, Statistics, and Sociology
  European Sociological Review, 2001
• Why transition from alternation to randomisation in clinical trials was made
  BMJ, 1999
• Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and rionfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components
  The Lancet, 1995
• The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
  Biometrika, 1983
• The need for randomization in the study of intended effects
  Statistics in Medicine, 1983
• CASE-CONTROL STUDIES IN THE EVALUATION OF DRUG-INDUCED ILLNESS
  American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
• Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization
  The Annals of Statistics, 1978