Conducting quantitative studies with the participation of political elites: best practices for designing the study and soliciting the participation of political elites
Open Access
- 22 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality & Quantity
- Vol. 55 (4) , 1281-1317
Abstract
Conducting quantitative research (e.g., surveys, a large number of interviews, experiments) with the participation of political elites is typically challenging. Given that a population of political elites is typically small by definition, a particular challenge is obtaining a sufficiently high number of observations and, thus, a certain response rate. This paper focuses on two questions related to this challenge: (1) What are best practices for designing the study? And (2) what are best practices for soliciting the participation of political elites? To arrive at these best practices, we (a) examine which factors explain the variation in response rates across surveys within and between large-scale, multi-wave survey projects by statistically analyzing a newly compiled dataset of 342 political elite surveys from eight projects, spanning 30 years and 58 countries, (b) integrate the typically scattered findings from the existing literature and (c) discuss results from an original expert survey among researchers with experience with such research (n = 23). By compiling a comprehensive list of best practices, systematically testing some widely held believes about response rates and by providing benchmarks for response rates depending on country, survey mode and elite type, we aim to facilitate future studies where participation of political elites is required. This will contribute to our knowledge and understanding of political elites’ opinions, information processing and decision making and thereby of the functioning of representative democracies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-11-005)
- Utrecht University
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-Sectional SurveysThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2012
- A response to Binmore, Harrison and Ross on Experimental Economics: Rethinking the RulesJournal of Economic Methodology, 2011
- Nonresponse Bias on Dimensions of Political Activity Amongst Political ElitesInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2008
- Westminster Women: The Politics of PresencePolitical Studies, 2003
- Sampling: Design and AnalysisTechnometrics, 2000
- Individual and Structural Influences on the Perception of Legislative Norms in Three European ParliamentsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- The Consequences of Large Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys of ElitesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1979
- National Elite Surveys: Some Experience From NorwayActa Sociologica, 1972
- Interviewing Political Elites in Cross-Cultural Comparative ResearchAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1964
- Survey Interviewing Among Members of CongressPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1960