Evaluation and Monitoring of Mycobacterium leprae Transmission in Household Contacts of Patients with Hansen's Disease in Colombia
Open Access
- 23 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Vol. 11 (1) , e0005325
Abstract
Leprosy in Colombia is in a stage of post elimination—since 1997, prevalence of the disease is less than 1/10000. However, the incidence of leprosy has remained stable, with 400–500 new cases reported annually, with MB leprosy representing 70% of these case and 10% having grade 2 disability. Thus, leprosy transmission is still occurring, and household contacts (HHCs) of leprosy patients are a population at high risk of contracting and suffering from the effects of the disease during their lifetime. We performed a cross-sectional study with the aim of evaluating leprosy transmission within Family Groups (FGs) from four Colombian departments: Antioquia, Bolívar, Córdoba and Sucre. This study included 159 FGs formed by 543 HHCs; 45 FGs were monitored twice, first in 2003 and again in 2012. Migration, forced displacement by violence, loss of contact with the health center and the lack of an agreement to participate in the second monitoring were the primary reasons not all FGs were tested a second time. In each HHC, a clinical examination was performed, epidemiological data recorded, the bacillary index determined, DNA was isolated for M. leprae detection by nested PCR and IgM anti-phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) titers were inspected. Further, DNA from M. leprae isolates were typed and compared among FGs. Twenty-two (4.1%) of the 543 HHCs had IgM anti-PGL-I positive antibody titers, indicating infection. Nasal swabs (NS) taken from 113 HHCs were tested by RLEP PCR; 18 (16%) were positive for M. leprae DNA and two new leprosy cases were detected among the HHCs. Of the confirmed HHCs with leprosy, it was possible to genotype the bacterial strains from both the index case and their HHCs. We found that the genotype of these two strains agreed at 9 markers, showing the individuals to be infected by the same strain, indicating familiar transmission. HHCs of leprosy patients not only are a high-risk population for M. leprae infection, they can act as M. leprae carriers and therefore serve as sources for transmission and infection. Our results confirm familiar leprosy transmission and suggest that follow-up of HHCs is a good strategy for early diagnosis of leprosy and to monitor its transmission. Leprosy in Colombia is considered in a post-elimination stage, as prevalence of the disease is less than 1/10000 since 1997. However, leprosy transmission is still common with 400 to 500 new cases reported each year—70% of them multibacillary (MB) and 10% with grade 2 disability, demonstrating late diagnosis. HHCs of leprosy patients are a population at risk for infection by M. leprae and the subsequent development of leprosy. However, the M. leprae incubation period is long, and measures to follow-up with this population are difficult and not included in leprosy control programs in Colombia. We performed this survey with the aim to evaluate leprosy transmission in family groups of leprosy patients from four Colombian departments: Antioquia, Bolívar, Córdoba and Sucre. Volunteers (n = 713), 170 (24%) leprosy patients and 543 (76%) HHCs belonging to 159 family groups (FG) were included after informed consent was given. Of these volunteers, 225 (31.5%) were monitored two times: 45 leprosy patients and 180 HHCs. Volunteers were given a clinical examination and epidemiological data was recorded. Skin biopsies, nasal swabs and slit skin samples from patients were taken for bacillary index determination and Mycobacterium leprae genotyping. Nasal swabs and slit skin samples from HHCs were tested by nested PCR. Additionally, serum samples were tested for IgM anti-phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) titers. Twenty-two (4.1%) of the 543 HHCs had IgM anti-PGL-I positive antibody titers, indicating infection. PCR of DNA isolated from nasal swabs was positive for M. leprae in 18 (16%) HHCs, suggesting the presence of carriers. Two new leprosy cases were detected among the HHCs. We found three leprosy cases in one family group, two of them multibacillary. The M. leprae genotype of these two strains agreed at 9 markers, showing these individuals are infected by the same M. leprae strain, indicative of familiar transmission. Our results confirm that leprosy transmission is active in a country where leprosy is in post-elimination stage.Keywords
Funding Information
- Colciencias (325649326135)
- Colciencias (325656933516-4)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- High rates of undiagnosed leprosy and subclinical infection amongst school children in the Amazon RegionMemórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2012
- Impact of PGL-I Seropositivity on the Protective Effect of BCG Vaccination among Leprosy Contacts: A Cohort StudyPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2012
- Gender differential on characteristics and outcome of leprosy patients admitted to a long-term care rural hospital in South-Eastern EthiopiaInternational Journal for Equity in Health, 2012
- Elimination of Leprosy as a public health problem by 2000 AD: an epidemiological perspectivePan African Medical Journal, 2011
- Probable Zoonotic Leprosy in the Southern United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Comparative genomic and phylogeographic analysis of Mycobacterium lepraeNature Genetics, 2009
- Physical Distance, Genetic Relationship, Age, and Leprosy Classification Are Independent Risk Factors for Leprosy in Contacts of Patients with LeprosyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Prospective Study of Serological Conversion as a Risk Factor for Development of Leprosy among Household ContactsClinical and Vaccine Immunology, 2004
- Genetics of susceptibility to leprosyGenes & Immunity, 2002
- Detection of Phenolic Glycolipid I of Mycobacterium leprae in Sera from Leprosy Patients before and after Start of Multidrug TherapyClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2001