No Difference in Static Postural Stability Bilaterally or Versus Control at 12 Weeks after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Open Access
- 1 December 2025
- journal article
- Published by International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy in International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1684-1691
Abstract
Background: Comparing static postural stability between the involved and uninvolved legs in individuals 12 weeks after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and against healthy controls, may provide insight into rehabilitation progression. Purpose: To compare static single-leg postural stability between the injured and uninjured legs of individuals 12 weeks post ACLR, and to a control group of healthy, physically active individuals. Study Design: Case-control study Methods: Twenty-nine participants (17 male, 12 female; age = 20.9 ± 5.0) 12 weeks post ACLR and 87 healthy controls (51 male, 36 female; age = 19.4 ± 1.2) volunteered. Static single-leg postural stability was assessed using an AMTI force plate under eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. Ground reaction force in three directions were recorded for each condition. Comparisons were made between the ACLR group and controls, as well as between the involved and uninvolved legs within the ACLR group. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank tests identified significant differences, and effect sizes were computed. Results: There were no significant differences within the ACLR group or between the ACLR and control groups for any static postural stability variable. Conclusions: Under the specific static postural stability test administered, individuals 12 weeks post ACLR did not show significant differences in static postural stability between their involved and uninvolved legs, or when compared to healthy controls. These findings suggest that static postural stability is either not significantly impacted by ACLR or that deficits resolve by 12 weeks post-surgery and may not need to be a primary focus of early rehabilitation. Alternatively, it is also possible that the challenge imposed in the current study was not sufficient to challenge the components required for postural stability and clinicians should consider integrating more difficult tasks. Level of Evidence: 3Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of early onset of rehabilitation on the postural stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2023
- There Is Substantial Variation in Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Survey of 46 American Orthopaedic SurgeonsArthroscopy, 2022
- Poor static balance is a risk factor for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuryArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2018
- ACL Rehabilitation Progression: Where Are We Now?Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2017
- Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesClinics in Sports Medicine, 2017
- Knee loading asymmetries during gait and running in early rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal studyClinical Biomechanics, 2016
- Prospectively identified deficits in sagittal plane hip–ankle coordination in female athletes who sustain a second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sportClinical Biomechanics, 2015
- Static and dynamic postural control in competitive athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controlsKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011
- Neuromuscular and biomechanical characteristics do not vary across the menstrual cycleKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2007
- Steadiness in one-legged stance: Development of a reliable force-platform testing procedureArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1992