Natural and Synthetic Peptides as Alternatives to Antibiotics in Intestinal Infections—A Review
Authors:
- Lala StepanyanLSLala Stepanyan
- Monika IsrayelyanMIMonika Israyelyan
- Alessandro GoriAGAlessandro Gori
- Avetis TsaturyanATAvetis Tsaturyan
- Jaklina SaribekyanJSJaklina Saribekyan
- Kristina HovsepyanKHKristina Hovsepyan
- Tatevik SargsyanTatevik Sargsyan
- Raffaele PastoreRPRaffaele Pastore
- Antonio De LucaAntonio De Luca
- Giovanni N. RovielloGiovanni N. Roviello
Preprint
- 1 January 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), evolutionarily conserved components of innate immunity characterized by their broad-spectrum efficacy and minimal resistance development, are increasingly recognized as promising therapeutic candidates. This review aims to integrate current knowledge concerning natural and synthetic antimicrobial peptides and their therapeutic effectiveness in addressing gastrointestinal infections. Methods: A literature review was performed, evaluating recent peer-reviewed studies on AMPs. The research concentrated on their molecular mechanisms of action, antimicrobial spectrum, as well as on their interactions with standard antibiotics. More in detail, the peptide classes examined herein included defensins, cathelicidins, histatins, and various natural peptides such as lactoferricin, protamines, RegIII, and hepcidin, along with synthetic analogs like WR12, D-IK8, MSI-78, IMX942. Results: Natural AMPs demonstrated significant antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp. Beyond direct antimicrobial activity, intestinal antimicrobial peptides act as integrated anti-infective agents by modulating host–microbiota interactions, preserving epithelial barrier integrity, and limiting inflammation, thereby offering a multifaceted strategy to control gastrointestinal infections. On the other hand, synthetic peptides showed better stability, less toxicity, and synergistic interactions with antibiotics, which suggests that they could be used either alone or in combination with other treatments. Conclusions: AMPs constitute a promising category endowed with anti-infective activity especially for therapy of intestinal diseases, which is attributed to their distinctive anti-infective mechanisms, immune-modulating characteristics, and a relatively low propensity for resistance development compared to conventional antibiotics. However, more clinical trials and improvements to their formulation are needed to translate promising in vitro results into reliable patient outcomes.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 212 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Conventional Drug Design: Exploring the Broad‐Spectrum Efficacy of Antimicrobial PeptidesChemistry & Biodiversity, 2024
- Unnatural Phosphorus‐Containing α‐Amino Acids and Their N‐FMOC Derivatives: Synthesis and In Vitro Investigation of Anticholinesterase ActivityChemistrySelect, 2024
- Antimicrobial peptides for novel antiviral strategies in the current post‐COVID‐19 pandemicJournal of Peptide Science, 2023
- Decarboxylative Peptide Macrocyclization through Photoredox CatalysisAngewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016
- Antimicrobial peptides: an alternative for innovative medicines?Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015
- Antimicrobial peptides and gut microbiota in homeostasis and pathologyEMBO Molecular Medicine, 2013
- On Exploring Structure–Activity Relationships2013
- A comparison of the different helices adopted by α‐ and β‐peptides suggests different reasons for their stabilityProtein Science, 2010
- Antimicrobial Peptides: The LPS Connection2009
- Synthesis, characterization and hybridization studies of an alternate nucleo-ε/γ-peptide: complexes formation with natural nucleic acidsAmino Acids, 2008