Coexistence, Exclusion, or Neutrality? A Meta-Analysis of Competition between Aedes Albopictus and Resident Mosquitoes
- 6 May 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 56 (3-4) , 325-351
Abstract
Competition experiments estimating the relative effects of inter- and intraspecific competition can help to resolve whether interspecific competition results in coexistence or exclusion. For mosquitoes, most such experiments have focused on invasiveAedes albopictusand its interactions with residentAedes.A meta-analysis of such experiments tested whether the effect of interspecific competition is greater than, less than, or equal to that of intraspecific competition, and whether competitive outcomes are dependent on food quality. ForA. albopictusandA. aegypti, there was significant context dependence, with interspecific competitive advantage forA. albopictuswith low food quality, and competitive equivalence with high food quality. Meta-analysis of survivorship yielded more significant effects than did estimated rate of increase. Competitive effects and competitive responses of each species yielded similar results. This meta-analysis suggests competitive exclusion ofA. aegyptibyA. albopictus, and is thus consistent with field sampling, qualitative reviews, and interpretations from individual publications. ForA. albopictusandA. triseriatus, most results indicated competitive equivalence and no context dependence, and are thus contrary to previous qualitative reviews and to interpretations from individual publications. For both pairs of species, published results suitable for meta-analysis remain scarce, and better experimental designs and improved analysis and reporting of statistical results are needed. Greater emphasis needs to be placed on estimating species' inter- and intraspecific competitive effects, rather than the more common, but theoretically less interesting, competitive responses. Experiments without low-density controls (i.e., replacement series) are inadequate for comparing competitive effects and responses.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distributions of Competing Container Mosquitoes Depend on Detritus Types, Nutrient Ratios, and Food AvailabilityAnnals of the Entomological Society of America, 2011
- Species Interactions Among Larval Mosquitoes: Context Dependence Across Habitat GradientsAnnual Review of Entomology, 2009
- Larval competition alters susceptibility of adultAedesmosquitoes to dengue infectionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- The significance of ratios of detritus types and micro‐organism productivity to competitive interactions between aquatic insect detritivoresJournal of Animal Ecology, 2007
- A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion?Oecologia, 2004
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plantsJournal of Ecology, 1999
- SPECIES INTRODUCTION AND REPLACEMENT AMONG MOSQUITOES: INTERSPECIFIC RESOURCE COMPETITION OR APPARENT COMPETITION?Ecology, 1998
- Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container‐inhabiting Aedes mosquitoesEcological Entomology, 1996
- Non-Linear Interactions of Populations and the Importance of Estimating Per Capita Rates of ChangeJournal of Animal Ecology, 1984