Marketing Channels and the Durable Goods Monopolist: Renting versus Selling Reconsidered
Author:
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 4 (1) , 69-84
Abstract
Research on durable goods has shown that because of a time inconsistency problem, a monopolist manufacturer prefers to rent rather than sell its product. We reexamine the relative profitability of renting versus selling from a marketing perspective. In particular, using a simple linear demand formulation, we assume a durable goods monopolist has to use downstream intermediaries to market its product. In contrast to the case of an integrated monopolist, we find that when the monopolist has to rely on intermediaries, then it prefers to go through an intermediary that sells rather than one that rents its product. Similarly, the intermediary that sells the product is more profitable than the intermediary that rents the product. However, if the monopolist can commit to a set of prices, then the intermediary that rents is more profitable than the intermediary that sells.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rentals, Sales, and Buybacks: Managing Secondary Distribution ChannelsJournal of Marketing Research, 1994
- The Changing Role of Marketing in the CorporationJournal of Marketing, 1992
- An Economic Theory of Planned ObsolescenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986
- The Durable Goods Monopolist and Consistency with Increasing CostsEconometrica, 1986
- Concurrent Renting and Selling in a Durable-Goods Monopoly under Threat of EntryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1986
- Cyclic Pricing by a Durable Goods MonopolistThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984
- Durable Good Monopolies with Rational Expectations and Replacement SalesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1984
- Durable-Goods MonopolistsJournal of Political Economy, 1982
- Rational Expectations and Durable Goods PricingThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981
- Vertical Integration and Antitrust PolicyJournal of Political Economy, 1950