Fully Automated Versions of Clinically Validated Nephrometry Scores Demonstrate Superior Predictive Utility versus Human Scores
- 11 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 133 (6) , 690-698
Abstract
Objective: To automate the generation of three validated nephrometry scoring systems on preoperative computerised tomography (CT) scans by developing artificial intelligence (AI)‐based image processing methods. Subsequently, we aimed to evaluate the ability of these scores to predict meaningful pathological and perioperative outcomes. Patients and Methods: A total of 300 patients with preoperative CT with early arterial contrast phase were identified from a cohort of 544 consecutive patients undergoing surgical extirpation for suspected renal cancer. A deep neural network approach was used to automatically segment kidneys and tumours, and then geometric algorithms were used to measure the components of the concordance index (C‐Index), Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical classification of renal tumours (PADUA), and tumour contact surface area (CSA) nephrometry scores. Human scores were independently calculated by medical personnel blinded to the AI scores. AI and human score agreement was assessed using linear regression and predictive abilities for meaningful outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Results: The median (interquartile range) age was 60 (51–68) years, and 40% were female. The median tumour size was 4.2 cm and 91.3% had malignant tumours. In all, 27% of the tumours were high stage, 37% high grade, and 63% of the patients underwent partial nephrectomy. There was significant agreement between human and AI scores on linear regression analyses ( R ranged from 0.574 to 0.828, all P < 0.001). The AI‐generated scores were equivalent or superior to human‐generated scores for all examined outcomes including high‐grade histology, high‐stage tumour, indolent tumour, pathological tumour necrosis, and radical nephrectomy (vs partial nephrectomy) surgical approach. Conclusions: Fully automated AI‐generated C‐Index, PADUA, and tumour CSA nephrometry scores are similar to human‐generated scores and predict a wide variety of meaningful outcomes. Once validated, our results suggest that AI‐generated nephrometry scores could be delivered automatically from a preoperative CT scan to a clinician and patient at the point of care to aid in decision making.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA225435)
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validationEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2018
- Big Data and Machine Learning in Health CareJAMA, 2018
- Machine learning-based quantitative texture analysis of CT images of small renal masses: Differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinomaEuropean Radiology, 2017
- Renal Tumor Contact Surface Area: A Novel Parameter for Predicting Complexity and Outcomes of Partial NephrectomyEuropean Urology, 2014
- Interobserver variability of R.E.N.A.L., PADUA, and centrality index nephrometry score systemsWorld Journal of Urology, 2014
- The RENAL Nephrometry Nomogram: Statistically Significant, But Is It Clinically Relevant?European Urology, 2011
- Anatomic Features of Enhancing Renal Masses Predict Malignant and High-Grade Pathology: A Preoperative Nomogram Using the RENAL Nephrometry ScoreEuropean Urology, 2011
- Kidney Tumor Location Measurement Using the C Index MethodJournal of Urology, 2010
- Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) Classification of Renal Tumours in Patients who are Candidates for Nephron-Sparing SurgeryEuropean Urology, 2009
- The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score: A Comprehensive Standardized System for Quantitating Renal Tumor Size, Location and DepthJournal of Urology, 2009