Follow-Up to High-Resolution Anoscopy After Abnormal Anal Cytology in People Living with HIV
Authors:
- 8 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in AIDS Patient Care and STDs
- Vol. 36 (7) , 263-271
Abstract
Current expert recommendations suggest anal cytology followed by high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) for biopsy and histological confirmation may be beneficial in cancer prevention, especially in people living with HIV (PLWH). Guided by the social ecological model, the purpose of this study was to examine sociodemographic and clinical variables, individual-level factors (depression, HIV/AIDS-related stigma, and health beliefs) and interpersonal-level factors (social support) related to time to HRA follow-up after abnormal anal cytology. We enrolled 150 PLWH from a large HIV community clinic, with on-site HRA availability, in Atlanta, GA. The median age was 46 years (interquartile range of 37–52), 78.5% identified as African American/black, and 88.6% identified as born male. The average length of follow-up to HRA after abnormal anal cytology was 380.6 days (standard deviation = 317.23). Only 24.3% (n = 39) of the sample had an HRA within 6 months after an abnormal anal cytology, whereas 57% of the sample had an HRA within 12 months. HIV/AIDS-related stigma [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.90] and health motivation (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67–0.95) were associated with time to HRA follow-up ≤6 months. For HRA follow-up ≤12 months, we found anal cytology [high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cannot exclude HSIL (HSIL/ASCUS-H) vs. low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.00–0.70; atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) vs. LSIL OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.64] and health motivation (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.65–0.99) were associated. Findings from this study can inform strategies to improve follow-up care after abnormal anal cytology at an individual and interpersonal level in efforts to decrease anal cancer morbidity and mortality.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practising high-resolution anoscopySexual Health, 2012
- Psychosocial aspects of anal cancer screening: a review and recommendationsSexual Health, 2012
- Anal cancer screeningThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- Risk of Anal Cancer in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Individuals in North AmericaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Recent trends and future directions in human immunodeficiency virus‐associated cancerCancer, 2010
- A Meta-Analysis of the Incidence of Non-AIDS Cancers in HIV-Infected IndividualsJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2009
- From Conceptualizing to Measuring HIV Stigma: A Review of HIV Stigma Mechanism MeasuresAIDS and Behavior, 2009
- Measuring AIDS stigmas in people living with HIV/AIDS: the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma ScaleAIDS Care, 2008
- Anal Cancer Screening: Barriers and Facilitators Among Ethnically Diverse Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Other Men Who Have Sex With MenJournal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 2008
- HIV/AIDS: Screening HIV‐Infected Individuals for Anal Cancer Precursor Lesions: A Systematic ReviewClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006