SHORT-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF AWAKE AND OUTPATIENT TRANSFORAMINAL ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR FORAMINOTOMY AND INTERSPINOUS SPACER DEVICE
Authors:
- Jorge Felipe Ramírez LeónJLJorge Felipe Ramírez León
- Yetzalis Antonieta Fernández VeraYVYetzalis Antonieta Fernández Vera
- Carolina Ramírez MartínezCMCarolina Ramírez Martínez
- José Gabriel Rugeles OrtízJOJosé Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz
- Nicolás Prada RamírezNRNicolás Prada Ramírez
- Viviana Marcela Plazas BedoyaVBViviana Marcela Plazas Bedoya
- João Paulo Machado BergamaschiJBJoão Paulo Machado Bergamaschi
- Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso CuéllarGabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar
Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Coluna/Columna
- Vol. 25 (2)
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes achieved with the combined surgical management of Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty (TELF) with an Interspinous Spacer Device (ISD) in patients with DS grades I and II and LSS. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using clinical records of patients who underwent a TELF procedure plus the placement of an ISD for LSS and DS. Demographic variables and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were analyzed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the combined procedures. A total of 37 patients (54.05% women, 45.95% men) were evaluated. The mean age was 59.59 ± 15.89 years (95% CI 55.29 – 64.89); 43.24% (n=16) of the sample were women aged 60 or older and 32.43% of the patients were “pensioner-retired.” The most common presenting symptom was radicular pain: 30.30% on the right side and 48.48% on the left side. A total of 49 TELF procedures were performed, and 45 ISD were placed in the 37 patients. The average procedure duration was 85.77 ± 28.54 minutes, and the average blood loss was 23.28 ± 21.96 ml. The most frequently operated level was L4-L5. Results: The VAS and ODI scores improved significantly differences (p <0.001) before and after the procedure. Two complications were observed (5.4%). The overall reoperation rate was 10.81% (n=4). Conclusion: Transforaminal endoscopic decompression with ISD represents a feasible and safe outpatient alternative for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis and stenosis. This combined minimally invasive technique provides significant clinical improvement with a low reoperation rate and offers a compelling alternative to more invasive surgery. Level of Evidence IV; Case Series.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and validation of a novel classification for characterizing degenerative spondylolisthesis of lumbar spineScientific Reports, 2025
- National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus DecompressionNeurospine, 2024
- Decompression without Fusion in Patients with Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Stenosis: Long-Term Patient-Reported OutcomeWorld Neurosurgery, 2024
- Laterality of lumbar disc herniationJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2022
- Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A ReviewPain and Therapy, 2021
- Percutaneous transforaminal full endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosisBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2020
- Degenerative Lumbar SpondylolisthesisNeurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2019
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive DecompressionNeurosurgery, 2017
- Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Epidemiological PerspectiveSpine, 2007
- Lumbar Stenosis With SpondylolisthesisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001