Pathologic predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 8 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 27 (8) , 2692-2703
Abstract
Colorectal adenocarcinoma with depth of invasion ≤1,000 μm from the muscularis mucosa and favorable histology is now considered for local resection. We aimed to examine the strength of evidence for this emerging practice. We searched Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane (1950–2011), then performed a meta-analysis on the risk of lymph node metastasis in nonpedunculated (sessile and nonpolypoid) T1 colorectal cancers. We included studies with nonpedunculated lesions, actual invasion depth, and pathologic factors of interest. Synchronous, polyposis or secondary cancers, and chemoradiation studies were excluded. Our primary outcome was the risk of LNM. We analyzed using Review Manager; we estimated heterogeneity using Cochran Q χ2 test and I 2. We generated summary risk ratios using a random effects model, performed sensitivity analyses, and evaluated the quality of evidence using GRADEPro. We identified 209 articles; 5 studies (n = 1213 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The risk of LNM in nonpedunculated ≤1,000 μm is 1.9 % (95 % confidence interval 0.5–4.8 %). The risk for all T1 is 13 % (95 % confidence interval 11.5–15.4 %). Characteristics protective against LNM were ≤1,000 μm invasion, well differentiation, absence of lymphatic and vascular invasion, and absence of tumor budding. We did not detect significant study heterogeneity. The quality of evidence was poor. Well-differentiated nonpedunculated T1 colorectal cancer invasive into the submucosa ≤1,000 μm, without lymphovascular involvement or tumor budding, has the lowest risk of nodal metastasis. Importantly, the risk was not zero (1.9 %), and the qualitative formal analysis of data was not strong. As such, endoscopic resection alone may be adequate in select patients with submucosal invasive colorectal cancers, but more studies are needed. Overall, the quality of evidence was poor; data were from small retrospective studies from limited geographic regions.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Su1522 Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis From Sessile or Nonpolypoid Early Colon Cancer: Stratified Criteria to Decide When to Operate or When to WatchGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- Pathological predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancerSurgery Today, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma of pedunculated or semipedunculated typeJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2006
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative studyJournal of Gastroenterology, 2004
- Clinical utility of grading criteria for submucosal invasion in the prognosis of T1 colorectal carcinomasJournal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Indication for Endoscopic Resection of Submucosal Colorectal Carcinoma: Special Reference to Lymph Node MetastasisDiagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, 1999
- The indication of endoscopic treatment for early colorectal cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Lymph node metastases in early rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993