Comparison of different trapping methods for surveillance of mosquito vectors of West Nile virus in Rhône Delta, France
Open Access
- 26 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society for Vector Ecology in Journal of Vector Ecology
- Vol. 37 (2) , 269-275
Abstract
Five trapping methods were compared for monitoring potential vectors of the West Nile virus in four areas in the Camargue Plain of France: carbon dioxide traps, bird-baited traps, gravid traps, resting boxes, and human landing catches. A total of 73,721 specimens, representing 14 species, was trapped in 2006. Results showed significant differences in species and abundance between the type of traps. Many more specimens were collected using CO2 traps than any other method, with an average of 212 specimens per night per trap (pCulex pipiens was the most abundant species collected (36.8% of total with CO2 traps), followed by Aedes caspius (22.7%), Anopheles hyrcanus (18.3%), Culex modestus (18.3%), and Aedes detritus (3.2%). Bird-baited traps captured only eight specimens per night per trap on average, mainly Cx. pipiens (89.9%). The species collected and their abundance are influenced by the trap location, at ground or canopy level. Culex pipiens was twice as abundant in the canopy as on the ground, whereas it was the opposite for Ae. caspius, An. hyrcanus, and Ae. detritus. Culex modestus was equally abundant at both levels. Resting boxes and gravid traps were much less efficient, capturing around 0.3 specimens per night per trap. Results are discussed in relation to West Nile virus surveillance.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vector Competence of Some French Culex and Aedes Mosquitoes for West Nile VirusVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 2008
- Magpies as Hosts for West Nile Virus, Southern FranceEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Horse-, Bird-, and Human-Seeking Behavior and Seasonal Abundance of Mosquitoes in a West Nile Virus Focus of Southern FranceJournal of Medical Entomology, 2006
- COMPARISON OF MOSQUITO TRAPPING METHOD EFFICACY FOR WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN NEW MEXICOJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2006
- Impact of Trap Elevation on Estimates of Abundance, Parity Rates, and Body Size of Culex pipiens and Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae)Journal of Medical Entomology, 2006
- West Nile Virus Epidemics in North America Are Driven by Shifts in Mosquito Feeding BehaviorPLOS Biology, 2006
- Bird-Baited Traps for Surveillance of West Nile Mosquito Vectors: Effect of Bird Species, Trap Height, and Mosquito Escape RatesJournal of Medical Entomology, 2006
- Sentinel Pigeon Surveillance for West Nile Virus by Using Lard-Can Traps at Differing Elevations and Canopy Cover ClassesJournal of Medical Entomology, 2005
- PREVALENCE OF WEST NILE VIRUS IN TREE CANOPY–INHABITING CULEX PIPIENS AND ASSOCIATED MOSQUITOESThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2004
- Mosquito host preference studies in Hale County, Texas *The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1973