Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association: a 10-year follow-up study
- 3 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 21 (4) , 467-473
Abstract
Background: We compared the quality of structured abstracts of original research articles from the British Medical Journal (BMJ), Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), and the Journa...Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting of numerical and statistical differences in abstractsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002
- The research abstract: worth getting it right.Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2001
- England and US corner the journal marketNature, 2000
- Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions?: A Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 1998
- Structured abstracts: a modest dissentJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Online Access to MEDLINE in Clinical SettingsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- More informative abstractsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1989
- Abstracts of clinical investigations. A new and standardized format.Chest, 1987
- A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical ArticlesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987