Cohort effects explain the increase in autism diagnosis among children born from 1992 to 2003 in California
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 41 (2) , 495-503
Abstract
Background The incidence and prevalence of autism have dramatically increased over the last 20 years. Decomposition of autism incidence rates into age, period and cohort effects disentangle underlying domains of causal factors linked to time trends. We estimate an age-period-cohort effect model for autism diagnostic incidence overall and by level of functioning. Methods Data are drawn from sequential cohorts of all 6 501 262 individuals born in California from 1992 to 2003. Autism diagnoses from 1994 to 2005 were ascertained from the California Department of Development Services Client Development and Evaluation Report. Results Compared with those born in 1992, each successively younger cohort has significantly higher odds of an autism diagnosis than the previous cohort, controlling for age and period effects. For example, individuals born in 2003 have 16.6 times the odds of an autism diagnosis compared with those born in 1992 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8–35.3]. The cohort effect observed in these data is stronger for high than for low-functioning children with an autism diagnosis. Discussion Autism incidence in California exhibits a robust and linear positive cohort effect that is stronger among high-functioning children with an autism diagnosis. This finding indicates that the primary drivers of the increases in autism diagnoses must be factors that: (i) have increased linearly year-to-year; (ii) aggregate in birth cohorts; and (iii) are stronger among children with higher levels of functioning.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age of diagnosis for autism: individual and community factors across 10 birth cohortsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2010
- What is a cohort effect? Comparison of three statistical methods for modeling cohort effects in obesity prevalence in the United States, 1971–2006Social Science & Medicine, 2010
- Diagnostic change and the increased prevalence of autismInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Advanced Parental Age and the Risk of Autism Spectrum DisorderAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Cumulative incidence of childhood autism: a total population study of better accuracy and precisionDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2007
- Three Reasons Not to Believe in an Autism EpidemicCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2005
- Cumulative incidence of childhood autism: a total population study of better accuracy and precisionDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2005
- Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: Changes over time and their meaning*Acta Paediatrica, 2005
- Cohort Analysts' Futile Quest: Statistical Attempts to Separate Age, Period and Cohort EffectsAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival DataAmerican Sociological Review, 1973