The Manchester Procedure as a Uterine-Preserving Alternative for Uterine Prolapse Due to Cervical Elongation: A Short- and Mid-Term Clinical Analysis
Open Access
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition that negatively impacts women’s quality of life. Uterine-preserving procedures are increasingly demanded by patients with uterine prolapse, particularly when associated with true cervical elongation. The Manchester procedure, historically used for uterine preservation, has regained interest due to its effectiveness and low morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of the Manchester procedure in women with uterine prolapse due to cervical elongation, assessing patient satisfaction and associated clinical factors. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, single-center study at the Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Spain, including patients undergoing the Manchester procedure between January 2017 and December 2022. Inclusion criteria required a diagnosis of uterine prolapse due to clinically confirmed true cervical elongation. Surgical details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale during follow-up visits. Results: A total of 38 patients were included, with a mean age of 48.7 years. All presented with symptomatic uterine prolapse and elongated cervix (>5 cm). The anatomical success rate was 97%, with only one case of symptomatic recurrence. The most common early postoperative complication was urinary tract infection (10.5%). The average follow-up duration was 18.6 months. A high level of satisfaction was recorded: 94.8% of patients were either “very satisfied” (73.7%) or “satisfied” (21.1%), and only 5.3% reported dissatisfaction. Multicompartmental repair (anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy) improved satisfaction outcomes. Conclusions: The Manchester procedure is a safe, effective uterine-sparing surgical option for patients with cervical elongation-related uterine prolapse. It demonstrates a high anatomical success rate and low morbidity, with excellent patient satisfaction. Comprehensive preoperative assessment and addressing modifiable risk factors such as obesity and smoking are key to optimizing results. Further prospective studies are needed to assess long-term durability and quality-of-life outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term outcome after routine surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—A national register-based cohort studyInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2022
- Obstetric outcomes after uterus-sparing surgery for uterine prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2021
- Gynecologists’ perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified ManchesterInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2020
- The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patientsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2006
- The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health careAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000