Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme
Authors:
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cytopathology
- Vol. 19 (4) , 254-259
Abstract
To evaluate the performance of rapid pre-screening (RPS) as a method of internal quality control in the cytopathological examination of cervical smears for cervical cancer screening. The sample consisted of 6135 cervical smears submitted to RPS and routine screening (RS) methods. The smears classified as negative in RPS and RS were considered final diagnoses, and were not, therefore, submitted to any additional review. The smears identified as suspect or unsatisfactory according to RPS were analysed separately by two different cytologists irrespective of the diagnosis reached in RS. Smears considered abnormal or unsatisfactory at RS were also reviewed. When both cytologists issued concordant diagnoses, this was considered the final diagnosis. Discordant results were analysed by a third cytologist and a consensus meeting was held to define the final diagnosis. Taking abnormalities detected by RS as the denominator, RPS had a sensitivity of 63.0% for the detection of all abnormal smears and 96.7% for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). When compared with the final diagnosis, sensitivity of RPS for all abnormal smears was 74.9% and for HSIL 95.0%. Of the 529 abnormal smears confirmed in the final diagnosis, 2.15% were detected only by the RPS. RPS is an effective alternative method of internal quality control with high sensitivity for the detection of more severe lesions. It also permits monitoring of the laboratory rate of false-negative results, and allows constant evaluation of the performance both of the pre-screening and RS cytologists.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measureCytopathology, 2006
- Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performanceCytopathology, 2006
- Rapid prescreening of papanicolaou smearsCancer, 2005
- Quality Assurance in Cervical SmearsActa Cytologica, 2005
- Rapid pre-screening of Pap smears in quality control: an Italian experienceCytopathology, 2004
- Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smearsCancer, 2002
- Rapid (partial) prescreening of cervical smears: the quality control method of choice?Cytopathology, 2002
- Rapid Screening of Cervical Smears as a Method of Internal Quality ControlActa Cytologica, 1997
- Rapid review (partial rescreening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality assurance implications.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995