Simulated Trading for Maryland's Nitrogen Loadings in the Chesapeake Bay
Authors:
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
- Vol. 37 (2) , 211-226
Abstract
We investigate nutrient trading for point and non-point sources for the Bay Restoration Fund in Maryland. We demonstrate how to use the proceeds from the tax revenue to mimic a market by trading high-cost upgrades of sewage treatment plants for low-cost winter cover crops. Under an optimistic assumption about costs for non-point sources and naïve assumptions about the lag from planting cover crops to changes in nitrogen load, we calculate that 100 percent of abatement could be achieved at 56 percent of total costs, while in a pessimistic scenario, 100 percent of abatement could be could be achieved at 83 percent of total costs.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions Be Penalized in a Trading Program?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008
- Market-based Approaches to Environmental RegulationFoundations and Trends® in Microeconomics, 2006
- The influence of ground water on nitrogen delivery to the Chesapeake Bay2003
- Differences in Social and Public Risk Perceptions and Conflicting Impacts on Point/Nonpoint Trading RatiosAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001
- An Interim Evaluation of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions TradingJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading RatioAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993
- Allocative Implications of Comparisons Between the Marginal Costs of Point and Nonpoint Source Pollution AbatementNortheastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1987