A method for the objective selection of landscape‐scale study regions and sites at the national level
Authors:
- Mark A.K. GillespieMGMark A.K. Gillespie
- Deepa SeenapathiDSDeepa Seenapathi
- Simon M. SmartSSSimon M. Smart
- 24 April 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Vol. 8 (11) , 1468-1476
Abstract
Summary: Ecological processes operating on large spatio‐temporal scales are difficult to disentangle with traditional empirical approaches. Alternatively, researchers can take advantage of ‘natural’ experiments, where experimental control is exercised by careful site selection. Recent advances in developing protocols for designing these ‘pseudo‐experiments’ commonly do not consider the selection of the focal region and predictor variables are usually restricted to two. Here, we advance this type of site selection protocol to study the impact of multiple landscape scale factors on pollinator abundance and diversity across multiple regions. Using datasets of geographic and ecological variables with national coverage, we applied a novel hierarchical computation approach to select study sites that contrast as much as possible in four key variables, while attempting to maintain regional comparability and national representativeness. There were three main steps to the protocol: (i) selection of six 100 × 100 km2 regions that collectively provided land cover representative of the national land average, (ii) mapping of potential sites into a multivariate space with axes representing four key factors potentially influencing insect pollinator abundance, and (iii) applying a selection algorithm which maximized differences between the four key variables, while controlling for a set of external constraints. Validation data for the site selection metrics were recorded alongside the collection of data on pollinator populations during two field campaigns. While the accuracy of the metric estimates varied, the site selection succeeded in objectively identifying field sites that differed significantly in values for each of the four key variables. Between‐variable correlations were also reduced or eliminated, thus facilitating analysis of their separate effects. This study has shown that national datasets can be used to select randomized and replicated field sites objectively within multiple regions and along multiple interacting gradients. Similar protocols could be used for studying a range of alternative research questions related to land use or other spatially explicit environmental variables, and to identify networks of field sites for other countries, regions, drivers and response taxa in a wide range of scenarios.Keywords
Funding Information
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Wellcome Trust
- Scottish Government
- Natural Environment Research Council (BB/H014934/1)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in BritainNature, 2016
- The effect of proximity to a honeybee apiary on bumblebee colony fitness, development, and performanceApidologie, 2014
- Pervasiveness of Parasites in PollinatorsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inferenceBiological Conservation, 2011
- Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapesEcology Letters, 2010
- The Landscape Similarity Toolbox: new tools for optimizing the location of control sites in experimental studiesEcography, 2010
- Impacts of a pesticide on pollinator species richness at different spatial scalesBasic and Applied Ecology, 2010
- Long‐range foraging by the honey‐bee, Apis mellifera L.Functional Ecology, 2000
- ITE Merlewood Land Classification of Great BritainJournal of Biogeography, 1996
- Ecology: Laboratory, field and natural experimentsNature, 1983