Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature review examining the evidence for impact of policies across seven different policy domains
Authors:
- Kevin VolfKVKevin Volf
- Enrique García BengoecheaEBEnrique García Bengoechea
- Anna GobisAGAnna Gobis
- Joanna ZukowskaJZJoanna Zukowska
- Sven MessingSMSven Messing
- Sarah ForbergerSFSarah Forberger
- Catherine WoodsCWCatherine Woods
- Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) ConsortiumPCPolicy Evaluation Network (PEN) Consortium
Open Access
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by F1000 Research Ltd in HRB Open Research
- Vol. 3, 62
Abstract
Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown. The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020).Keywords
Funding Information
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt
- Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
- Health Research Board (JPI-HDHL-PEN-2017-1)
- Joint Programming Initiative A healthy diet for a healthy life
- University of Auckland
- ZonMw
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting on dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Europe: The Policy Evaluation Network promoting a multidisciplinary approachFood Policy, 2020
- A global systematic scoping review of studies analysing indicators, development, and content of national-level physical activity and sedentary behaviour policiesInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2018
- The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseasesThe Lancet, 2016
- Investments that Work for Physical ActivityBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012
- Rethinking our approach to physical activityThe Lancet, 2012
- The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public healthThe Lancet, 2012
- Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancyThe Lancet, 2012
- Physical Inactivity: The “Cinderella” Risk Factor for Noncommunicable Disease PreventionJournal of Health Communication, 2011
- The Toronto Charter for Physical Activity: A Global Call for ActionJournal of Physical Activity and Health, 2010
- The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1998