A focused ethnography in the context of a European cancer research hospital accreditation program
Open Access
- 11 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
A quality accreditation program (AP) is designed to guarantee predefined quality standards of healthcare organizations. Evidence of the impact of quality standards remains scarce and somewhat challenging to document. This study aimed to investigate the accreditation of a cancer research hospital (Italy), promoted by the Organization of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), by focusing on the individual, group, and organizational experiences resulting from the OECI AP. A focused ethnography study was carried out to analyze the relevance of participation in the accreditation process. Twenty-nine key informants were involved in four focus group meetings, and twelve semistructured interviews were conducted with professionals and managers. Inductive qualitative content analysis was applied to examine all transcripts. Four main categories emerged: a) OECI AP as an opportunity to foster diversity within professional roles; b) OECI AP as a possibility for change; c) perceived barriers; and d) OECI AP-solicited expectations. The accreditation process is an opportunity for improving the quality and variety of care services for cancer patients through promoting an interdisciplinary approach to care provision. Perceiving accreditation as an opportunity is a prerequisite for overcoming the barriers that professionals involved in the process may report. Critical to a positive change is sharing the values and the framework, which are at the basis of accreditation programs. Improving the information-sharing process among managers and professionals may limit the risk of unmet expectations and prevent demotivation by future accreditation programs. Finally, we found that positive changes are more likely to happen when an accreditation process is considered an activity whose results depend on managers’ and professionals’ joint work.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The standard of healthcare accreditation standards: a review of empirical research underpinning their development and impactBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: a Systematic Review of the LiteratureAnnals of Saudi Medicine, 2011
- Accreditation and ISO certification: do they explain differences in quality management in European hospitals?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2010
- An Analysis of the Association of Society of Chest Pain Centers Accreditation to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Guideline AdherenceAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Are accreditation surveys reliable?International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2009
- Transformative impact of Magnet designation: England case studyJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2008
- Managing cancer in the EU: The Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI)☆Executive Committee: Ulrik Ringborg (President), Thomas Tursz (Past President), Marco Pierotti (President Elect), Guy Storme (Executive Secretary). E-mail address: ulrik.ringborg@karolinska.se (U. Ringborg).☆European Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Health sector accreditation research: a systematic reviewInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008
- Accreditation: a tool for organizational change in hospitals?International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2004
- Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative dataBMJ, 2000