Hemodynamic Characteristics of Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients: A Cohort Analysis
Open Access
- 4 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Critical Care Research and Practice
- Vol. 2021, 1-7
Abstract
Background. Solid data on cardiovascular derangements in critically ill COVID-19 patients remain scarce. The aim of this study is to describe hemodynamic characteristics in a cohort of COVID-19-related critically ill patients. Methods. A retrospective observational cohort study in twenty-eight consecutive mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Pulse contour analysis-derived data were obtained from all patients, using the PiCCO® system. Results. The mean arterial pressure increased from 77 ± 10 mmHg on day 1 to 84 ± 9 mmHg on day 21 ( ), in combination with the rapid tapering and cessation of norepinephrine and the gradual use of antihypertensive drugs in the vast majority of patients. The cardiac index increased significantly from 2.8 ± 0.7 L/min/m2 on day 1 to 4.0 ± 0.8 L/min/m2 on day 21 ( ). Dobutamine was administered in only two patients. Mean markers of left ventricular contractility and peripheral perfusion, as well as lactate levels, remained within the normal range. Despite a constant fluid balance, extravascular lung water index decreased significantly from 17 ± 7 mL/kg on day 1 to 11 ± 4 mL/kg on day 21 ( ). Simultaneously, intrapulmonary right-to-left shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) decreased significantly from 27 ± 10% in week 1 to 15 ± 9% in week 3 ( ). PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved from 159 ± 53 mmHg to 319 ± 53 mmHg ( ), but static lung compliance remained unchanged. Conclusions. In general, this cohort of patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure showed a marked rise in blood pressure over time, not accompanied by distinctive markers of circulatory failure. Characteristically, increased extravascular lung water, vascular permeability, and intrapulmonary shunt diminished over time, concomitant with an improvement in gas exchange.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a “Typical” Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2020
- Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in ChinaJAMA, 2020
- Changes in shunt, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and lung aeration with PEEP in patients with ARDS: a prospective single-arm interventional studyCritical Care, 2020
- Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injuryScience China Life Sciences, 2020
- Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: Hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Lung Recruitment in Patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- The Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale: Validity and Reliability in Adult Intensive Care Unit PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care unitsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Histamine-release haemodynamic changes produced by rocuronium, vecuronium, mivacurium, atracurium and tubocurarineBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995