Comparing the environmental impacts of uranium- and thorium-based fuel cycles with different recycle options
Authors:
- Timothy AultTATimothy Ault
- Steven KrahnSKSteven Krahn
- Allen CroffACAllen Croff
- 1 September 2017
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Progress in Nuclear Energy
- Vol. 100, 114-134
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- U.S. Department of Energy, under the Nuclear Energy University Program
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thorium Fuel Cycles with Externally Driven SystemsNuclear Technology, 2016
- Natural Thorium Resources and Recovery: Options and ImpactsNuclear Technology, 2016
- Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water ReactorsSustainability, 2012
- SCALE 6: Comprehensive Nuclear Safety Analysis Code SystemNuclear Technology, 2011
- Occupational radiation exposure due to norm in a rare-earth compounds production facilityRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2008
- Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Environmental ImpactMRS Bulletin, 2008
- Research Profile: Detection of 36Cl in nuclear reactor waste2007
- U‐232 and the proliferation‐resistance of U‐233 in spent fuelScience & Global Security, 2001
- An Overview of Superphénix Commissioning TestsNuclear Science and Engineering, 1990
- The Fort St. Vrain high temperature gas-cooled reactorNuclear Engineering and Design, 1979