Predictors of outplanted marine bivalve survival in restoration: A review and synthesis
Open Access
- 22 October 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 61 (12) , 2884-2896
Abstract
Global declines in marine shellfish have resulted in widespread efforts to restore populations. Previous research has predominantly focused on substrate‐limited rather than recruitment‐limited systems, yet given increased use of aquaculture‐produced stock to restore marine bivalves, there is a need to understand differences in the survival of hatchery‐produced and translocated wild stock. We conducted a systematic review and synthesis of studies that quantified the survival of outplanted marine bivalves. The systematic review identified 893 unique stocking events across 111 studies for 29 species across 10 families. Most research has occurred in temperate regions (73%), across four bivalve families (Ostreidae 37%, Pectinidae 20%, Veneridae 16% and Mytilidae 11%). More stockings have outplanted hatchery‐produced (66%) than translocated stock (34%). We conducted quantitative analyses for five species to determine how stock origin, size at outplant, outplant density, substrate co‐deployment, predator exclusion and time since outplant influences survival. Survival consistently decreased through time across all species. Substrate co‐deployment, stock origin and size at outplant did not influence survival, while predator exclusion and outplant density affected some species. Synthesis and applications. Our analyses broadly demonstrate variability in the survival of outplanted bivalves through time, however predicted survival was poor after 2 years (<3%). Generally low survival highlights difficulties associated with conducting scalable restoration in recruitment‐limited systems. Based on our findings, using hatchery‐produced stock, mitigating predation and outplanting epifaunal bivalves at high densities may increase survival probabilities when outplanting stock for restoration. Further exploration is needed to understand whether use of aquaculture‐produced stock results in similar ecosystem structure, function, and service provisioning to natural and restored shellfish reefs in recruitment‐limited systems.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta‐analysis reveals drivers of restoration success for oysters and reef communityEcological Applications, 2023
- Which concrete substrate suits you? Ostrea edulis larval preferences and implications for shellfish restoration in EuropeEcological Engineering, 2021
- Return of the native: Survival, growth and condition of European oysters reintroduced to German offshore watersAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2020
- A scientific framework for conservation aquaculture: A case study of oyster restoration in central CaliforniaBiological Conservation, 2020
- Conservation translocations and post-release monitoring: Identifying trends in failures, biases, and challenges from around the worldBiological Conservation, 2019
- Learning from published project failures in conservationBiological Conservation, 2019
- Increasing microhabitat complexity on seawalls can reduce fish predation on native oystersEcological Engineering, 2018
- Conservation aquaculture: Shifting the narrative and paradigm of aquaculture's role in resource managementBiological Conservation, 2017
- Phenotypic differences may limit the potential for habitat restoration involving species translocation: a case study of shape ecophenotypes in different populations of Modiolus modiolus (Mollusca: Bivalvia)Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2014
- How successful are plant species reintroductions?Biological Conservation, 2011