Composition and reversibility of fouling on low-pressure membranes in the filtration of coagulated water: insights into organic fractions behaviour
Open Access
- 11 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 57 (54) , 26313-26326
Abstract
The primary problem for the application of microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane technology is membrane fouling. Such is the case that understanding membrane fouling has become one of the major factors driving MF and UF membrane technology forward. Nevertheless, identifying the constituents that most contribute to membrane fouling and quantifying how they are detached when backwashing (BW) and cleaning-in-place (CIP) are applied still remains a challenging task. The aim of the present study was to quantify membrane fouling development during filtration and membrane fouling detachment during BW and CIP in terms of membrane permeability changes and masses of inorganic and organic constituents accumulated on the membrane. The study was conducted using bench-scale MF and UF modules fed with coagulated and settled water coming from a drinking water treatment plant and operated under dead-end and cross-flow operation modes. The experiments consisted inconsecutive permeation (20 min) alternated with BW with permeate water (1.0 min) (periodically chemically assisted with NaClO and NaOH) and followed by a two-stage CIP consisting first in an oxidising and basic step (NaClO and NaOH) and second in an acidic step (citric acid). Feed, permeate, retentate (when present) and cleaning discharge streams were monitored for turbidity, total and dissolved organic carbon (TOC and DOC, respectively), UV254 and inorganic ions (Al, Fe, P). DOC was fractionated by high-performance size exclusion chromatography to gain insight into the behaviour of the different organic fractions. Results showed that both MF and UF membranes successfully removed turbidity, Al and Fe, whereas UV254 was moderately removed and TOC and DOC poorly removed, with removal percentages higher for UF than for MF. With regard to the organic fractions, the largest molecular weight compounds were moderately removed while the smallest organic fractions seemed to totally permeate through both membranes. The results also showed that foulants were poorly washed out from the membrane by BW, but better extracted by the two-stage CIP up to a complete detachment for some foulants.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Filtration of natural organic matter using ultrafiltration membranes for drinking water purposes: Circular cross-flow compared with stirred dead end flowChemical Engineering Journal, 2015
- Backwashing pressurized ultrafiltration using reverse osmosis brine in seawater desalination and its potential costs savingsDesalination and Water Treatment, 2015
- Fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes: A reviewJournal of Water Process Engineering, 2014
- A mini-review on membrane foulingBioresource Technology, 2012
- Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A reviewSeparation and Purification Technology, 2010
- Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes — A critical reviewDesalination, 2010
- Pretreatment for Low Pressure Membranes in Water Treatment: A ReviewEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2009
- The effects of natural organic matter (NOM) fractions on fouling characteristics and flux recovery of ultrafiltration membranesDesalination, 2007
- Water and wastewater filtration: Membrane module formatFiltration + Separation, 2007
- Pretreatment trends — an overviewDesalination, 2007