Prospective Analysis of Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction
Authors:
- Amy K. AldermanAAAmy K. Alderman
- Julie C. LoweryJLJulie C. Lowery
- Latoya E. KuhnLKLatoya E. Kuhn
- Jenny DavisJDJenny Davis
- Edwin G. WilkinsEWEdwin G. Wilkins
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 247 (6) , 1019-1028
Abstract
To prospectively evaluate the psychosocial outcomes and body image of patients 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction using a multicenter, multisurgeon approach. Although breast reconstruction has been shown to confer significant psychosocial benefits in breast cancer patients at year 1 postreconstruction, we considered the possibility that psychosocial outcomes may remain in a state of flux for years after surgery. Patients were recruited as part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study, a 12 center, 23 surgeon prospective cohort study of mastectomy reconstruction patients. Two-sided paired sample t tests were used to compare change scores for the various psychosocial subscales. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the magnitude of the change score varied by procedure type. Preoperative and postoperative year 2 surveys were received from 173 patients; 116 with immediate and 57 with delayed reconstruction. For the immediate reconstruction cohort, significant improvements were observed in all psychosocial subscales except for body image. This occurred essentially independent of procedure type. In the cohort with delayed reconstruction, significant change scores were observed only in body image. Women with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps had significantly greater gains in body image scores (P = 0.003 and P = 0.034, respectively) when compared with expander/implants. General psychosocial benefits and body image gains continued to manifest at 2 years postmastectomy reconstruction. In addition, procedure type had a surprisingly limited effect on psychosocial well being. With outcomes evolving beyond year 1, these data support the need for additional longitudinal breast reconstruction outcome studies.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategiesAnz Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two-Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002
- Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstructionEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstructionEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2000
- A Prospective and Randomized Study, “SVEA,” Comparing Effects of Three Methods for Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life, Patient-Defined Problem Areas of Life, and Cosmetic ResultPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expansion: A Follow-Up StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Prospective Evaluation of Immediate Reconstruction After MastectomyAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Capsular Contracture after Breast Reconstruction with Silicone-Gel and Saline-Filled ImplantsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1990
- Psychosocial Correlates of Immediate versus Delayed Reconstruction of the BreastPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1985