Impact of caregivers’ unmet needs for supportive care on quality of terminal cancer care delivered and caregiver’s workforce performance
Authors:
- 31 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 18 (6) , 699-706
Abstract
Family caregivers play an important role in caring for cancer patients, but the impact of caregivers’ unmet needs on the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care they deliver and on their workplace performance are less understood. We identified 1,662 family caregivers of cancer patients who had died at any of 17 hospitals in Korea during 2004. The caregivers answered a telephone questionnaire about needs that were not met when they delivered terminal cancer care and how those unmet their needs affected their workplace performance; they also answered the Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). Compared with caregivers who did not have unmet needs, caregivers who had unmet needs for symptom management, financial support, or community support showed poorer QCQ-EOL scores (P < 0.01). Caregivers who had unmet needs for financial support (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 7.55; 95% confidential interval (CI) 3.80–15.00), psychosocial support (aOR = 6.24; 95% CI 2.95–13.05), symptom management (aOR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.26–4.54), community support (aOR = 3.82; 95% CI 2.38–6.11), or religious support (aOR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.84–11.26) were more likely to experience work limitations. Caregivers of patients receiving conventional hospital care were more likely to have unmet needs for symptom management (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.00–1.47), psychosocial support (aOR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.37–2.88), and religious support (aOR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.08–2.78) than those of patients receiving palliative hospice care. Caregivers’ unmet needs negatively affected both the quality of EOL care they delivered and their workplace performance. More investment in caregiver support and public policies that meet caregiver needs are needed, and hospice use should be encouraged.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aggressiveness of Cancer-Care near the End-of-Life in KoreaJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Patient-reported assessment of quality care at end of life: Development and validation of Quality Care Questionnaire–End of Life (QCQ–EOL)European Journal of Cancer, 2006
- How is place of death from cancer changing and what affects it? Analysis of cancer registration and service dataBritish Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression, Propensity Matching, Propensity Adjustment, and Propensity-based Weighting under Conditions of Nonuniform EffectAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Factors influencing preferences for place of terminal care and of death among cancer patients and their families in KoreaSupportive Care in Cancer, 2005
- Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregiversCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- Decreasing Variation in the Use of Hospice Among Older Adults With Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate CancerMedical Care, 2004
- Assistance from Family Members, Friends, Paid Care Givers, and Volunteers in the Care of Terminally Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The impact of serious illness on patients' families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of TreatmentJAMA, 1994
- Psychological morbidity in the families of patients with cancerPsycho-Oncology, 1994