Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSA Select , and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs
Authors:
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 45 (8) , 2486-2490
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing problem. Rapid detection of MRSA-colonized patients has the potential to limit spread of the organism. We evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of MRSA detection by two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) and three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSA Select , and CHROMagar MRSA), using 205 (101 nasal, 52 groin, and 52 axillary samples) samples from consecutive known MRSA-infected and/or -colonized patients. All detection methods had higher MRSA detection rates for nasal swabs than for axillary and groin swabs. Detection of MRSA by IDI-MRSA was the most sensitive method, independent of the site (94% for nasal samples, 80% for nonnasal samples, and 90% overall). The sensitivities of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay and the MRSA ID, MRSA Select , and CHROMagar MRSA agars with nasal swabs were 70%, 72%, 68%, and 75%, respectively. All detection methods had high specificities (95 to 99%), independent of the swab site. Extended incubation for a further 24 h with selective MRSA agars increased the detection of MRSA, with a corresponding decline in specificity secondary to a significant increase in false-positive results. There was a noticeable difference in test performance of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay in detection of MRSA (28/38 samples [74%]) compared with detection of nonmultiresistant MRSA (17/31 samples [55%]) (susceptible to two or more non-β-lactam antibiotics). This was not observed with selective MRSA agar plates or IDI-MRSA. Although it is more expensive, in addition to rapid turnaround times of 2 to 4 h, IDI-MRSA offers greater detection of MRSA colonization, independent of the swab site, than do conventional selective agars and GenoType MRSA Direct.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a New Chromogenic Medium, MRSA Select , for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- Direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens by a nucleic acid-based hybridisation assayClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006
- Performance of CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR AssayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Genetic Diversity among Community Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Causing Outpatient Infections in AustraliaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- New Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Methicillin- ResistantStaphylococcus aureusDirectly from Specimens Containing a Mixture of StaphylococciJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- Community‐Acquired Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureus:A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence and Risk FactorsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- The Economic Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian HospitalsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- Effectiveness of Contact Isolation during a Hospital Outbreak of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureusAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Sensitivity of surveillance cultures for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a nursing-home-care unitDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993