A Routine Activity Theory Explanation for Women's Stalking Victimizations
Authors:
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Violence Against Women
- Vol. 5 (1) , 43-62
Abstract
Drawing on surveys administered to 861 university women in nine institutions, this article presents a routine activity theory model for predicting stalking victimization likelihood for women. Using routine activity theory, the model highlights lifestyle behaviors and interactions as predictors of stalking victimization. Whereas routine activity theory often highlights the role of demographics and statuses as predictors, this analysis emphasizes the role of women's social interactions and substance use in victimization risk. Significant predictors of victimization likelihood include substance use variables, activities in public settings, and residence off campus.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stalking Behavior and the Cycle of Domestic ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 1997
- Using and Interpreting Logistic Regression: A Guide for Teachers and StudentsTeaching Sociology, 1996
- Boozing and brawling on campus: A national study of violent problems associated with drinking over the past decadeJournal of Criminal Justice, 1994
- Gender Differences in Serial MurderersJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 1994
- Stalking In America: Types and Methods of Criminal StalkersJournal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1993
- Drinking routines/lifestyles and predatory victimization: A causal analysisJustice Quarterly, 1989
- School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of National Crime Survey (NCS) narrativesJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1987
- Routine activity and victimization at workJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1987
- Residential Burglary in the United States: Life-Style and Demographic Factors Associated With the Probability of VictimizationJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1981
- Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity ApproachAmerican Sociological Review, 1979